IceEidolon
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2017
- Messages
- 588
- Points
- 63
I'm not totally familiar with the backend but I'm assuming like most resorts the limit at marginal temperatures is compressed air, not water. This changes as the wetbulb drops. New low energy guns let more snow be made earlier by using air more efficiently - an HKD Impulse has a 4:1 air water ratio (80 cfm, 20 gpm) at high pressure.* A straight air water gun might require 500 cfm to output the same amount of water at the same temp. There is absolutely a difference in surface quality at marginal temperatures, if you want quality snow. If you want base snow, there isn't - both will make a wet pile if you ask them to.
So, if you have a fixed amount of air, say 20,000 cfm, and a fixed amount of water, say 5,000 gpm, and we can assume a typical 10:1 air water ratio. I usually see 13:1 but we can be optimistic. That's 2,000 gpm at startup with old school guns, focused on one trail.
Compare to the modern system, with the full 5,000 gpm running on four trails. More than twice the snow gets made - even after accounting for drainage and other losses it's double at least. However, it's spread thinner, so to get the same base depth it takes twice as much run time. Early season, the first few trails take longer. The flipside is that more trails see more snowmaking sooner, the mountain opens faster overall, etc. That's assuming the same amount of snow gets made, that management doesn't put a little extra onto race trails, parks, or main avenues since the snow is on 33% off sale.
There are times that you need big air. A hybrid approach is better than scrapping all rats. Sometimes one pile tonight is better than four piles in two days - super low air guns like early Snowlogics, TA's EVO or TL6, often have this issue, where they use no air but take forever, not just a long time. But generally low energy guns are a godsend.
*This is very configurable - from well over 100 cfm down to below 50 - but 80 is a good baseline.
Sent from my Life Max using Tapatalk
So, if you have a fixed amount of air, say 20,000 cfm, and a fixed amount of water, say 5,000 gpm, and we can assume a typical 10:1 air water ratio. I usually see 13:1 but we can be optimistic. That's 2,000 gpm at startup with old school guns, focused on one trail.
Compare to the modern system, with the full 5,000 gpm running on four trails. More than twice the snow gets made - even after accounting for drainage and other losses it's double at least. However, it's spread thinner, so to get the same base depth it takes twice as much run time. Early season, the first few trails take longer. The flipside is that more trails see more snowmaking sooner, the mountain opens faster overall, etc. That's assuming the same amount of snow gets made, that management doesn't put a little extra onto race trails, parks, or main avenues since the snow is on 33% off sale.
There are times that you need big air. A hybrid approach is better than scrapping all rats. Sometimes one pile tonight is better than four piles in two days - super low air guns like early Snowlogics, TA's EVO or TL6, often have this issue, where they use no air but take forever, not just a long time. But generally low energy guns are a godsend.
*This is very configurable - from well over 100 cfm down to below 50 - but 80 is a good baseline.
Sent from my Life Max using Tapatalk