Edd
Well-known member
Congrats on the 4 miles, that’s the dream.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
As far as I'm concerned every mountain should be the best version of itself no matter what the size or where the location.Ski Roundtop in southcentral PA, 4 miles from home. I mean its great I have a pass I can use up north and out west. But they've done some really stupid things here in PA as well. Pales in comparison to Attitash and Wildcat, but still.
How is the infrastructure at the three south PA areas? Do they need lifts / snowmaking investment or are they in good shape?I mean it really is. Sure the skiing isn't great, but its skiing 4 miles from home and there is some decently challenging steeps. Yes they are super short. On the weekends there is a vibrant tailgating scene, at least vail hasn't shit on that yet. There will be a mutiny if they do. but again, what am I going to do drive 2 hours to Blue Mountain or 7 Springs? Nope. Vail has me by the balls. So my goal is to ski as many days as possible to make the price per visit as low as possible.
I mean, this seriously does not seem hard, and also obvious. I’m trying to equate the stupidity to another large corporation but drawing a blank.As far as I'm concerned every mountain should be the best version of itself no matter what the size or where the location.
This should be there philosophy if they really want to maintain their brand. They Drill all the core value "experience of a lifetime" into new employees. As a company if they wanted to continue to succeed they would live by this. I'll take cookie cutter mountains if they're day to day operations are solid
Pick any healthcare conglomerate.I mean, this seriously does not seem hard, and also obvious. I’m trying to equate the stupidity to another large corporation but drawing a blank.
snowmaking infrastructure is in pretty good shape. Roundtop does have about 20 old highland fans on 2 trails but they are supplemented with newer technology. the other 2 are in similar shape. Roundtop has 5500 GPM pumping capacity to feed all of the fans. they can lay it down when they want to.How is the infrastructure at the three south PA areas? Do they need lifts / snowmaking investment or are they in good shape?
So you're saying that they're 80% accurate? You're nice ...Everything is now 20% less accurate then it was before!
So what did Vail do here in PA? I didn't even ski locally last year b/c of the COVID crap, like taking all of the tables out of the lodge at Jack Frost.Ski Roundtop in southcentral PA, 4 miles from home. I mean its great I have a pass I can use up north and out west. But they've done some really stupid things here in PA as well. Pales in comparison to Attitash and Wildcat, but still.
Hmmm, that’s interesting news.They've killed a wildly popular night/club pass that was affordable and driven many of those people becasue they have no interest in skiing elsewhere or can't afford it. They reduced night operations although I've heard that they'll only be closed Mon Tue nights this year. Killed off the adult race league, which cost them no money to run it was sponsored by a local brewery and folks would happily drink beer in the bar after the race.
I didn't go in the lodge last year so I honestly don't know what the deal was at Roundtop.
Given the size of their east coast resorts, I pretty sure we are beyond feeder hill status in the overall corporate income.Feeder hills
Most pale compared to their Rocky Mountain resorts in size. Don’t fool yourself…Given the size of their east coast resorts, I pretty sure we are beyond feeder hill status in the overall corporate income.
Sorry, I meant to say the number of resorts, not the size. I still think the overall pass sales and income might be coming close to what they get out west.Most pale compared to their Rocky Mountain resorts in size. Don’t fool yourself…
Sorry, I meant to say the number of resorts, not the size. I still think the overall pass sales and income might be coming close to what they get out west.
That is my worry, and should be Vail's - supporting new entrants into the sport. In the NE I figure the Indy's will fill the gap. But who is the reasonably priced Indy in SE PA?For someone like me who skis a lot, and north and out west it's great. But how does someone new get into the sport? That's what the bozos in Broomfield, CO can't figure out. I started in that program and graduated to a season pass for my entire family. Now you are expecting people to jump right into a very expensive pass product out of the gate with no rental option or lesson and rental option. Its ridiculous...
Vail does not own 10,000+ beds in Vail Village, they own 350 beds in Vail Village! They also don't own dozens of restaurants in Vail. Beaver Creek has just 120 vail owned beds.No way. Just the lodging and f/b from Vail Village and Beaver Creek probably create more income than all the East. But we'll never know for sure...or maybe they post it in their SEC filings by region?
The East Coast resorts serve two purposes.... get people to buy the pass and fly out west. And (more importantly) Vail had snatched up all the properties in western North America they could...so to continue the growth they had to expand and buy EC properties.
It's the 10,000+ beds in Vail Village and dozens of restaurants where a plate is $40 that make the money....there's nothing like that in the East that's even close to generating that much $$$.
Blue Knob is such a diamond in the rough. It's a shame that it's so isolated.That is my worry, and should be Vail's - supporting new entrants into the sport. In the NE I figure the Indy's will fill the gap. But who is the reasonably priced Indy in SE PA?
BTW, I grew up skiing Charnita (now Liberty), Roundtop and Blue Knob.
I find that extremely hard to believe if you actually looked at their financial details. Over 85% of Vail's revenue comes from their mountain segment (lift, ski school, on-mountain dining, retail, etc...with over 50% of that being lift ticket/pass revenue alone). Their lodging segment (including dining attributable to their lodge properties) is not responsible for anywhere near what the mountains themselves generate. If you look at it on a net income basis instead of revenue, the breakdown is even worse (over 95% attributable to mountain segment vs lodging).No way. Just the lodging and f/b from Vail Village and Beaver Creek probably create more income than all the East. But we'll never know for sure...or maybe they post it in their SEC filings by region?
The East Coast resorts serve two purposes.... get people to buy the pass and fly out west. And (more importantly) Vail had snatched up all the properties in western North America they could...so to continue the growth they had to expand and buy EC properties.
It's the 10,000+ beds in Vail Village and dozens of restaurants where a plate is $40 that make the money....there's nothing like that in the East that's even close to generating that much $$$.