Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Exactly.This is the worst possible outcome. They have gone the planet fitness model, make it so cheap that people do not bother canceling. This is exactly what ASC did near the end.
Alterra and Vail want to hire you for their marketing departments.Lots of time to meet new friends in the hour+ lines next year if thats the experience you’re looking for.
Did anyone notice the price reduction is for everyone, not just for previous passholder renewing?they have officially stated that they don't give a shit about the experience.
It's not one way or the other. A happy medium can be achieved.
Yes, that is true. I remember those days. Just shows how we have all changed and become those old men who don't want kids on our lawns.Don't love Vail or Epic, but as a longtime reader before joining this forum, it is somewhat hilarious to see people complaining about pass prices being low when for years so many of the posts on this forum were complaining about pass prices being high or looking for ways to find discounts, BOGOs, etc. The Stowe complaining in particular is funny as I remember every year multiple posters criticizing AIG for their prices, trying to be a premium resort with all the "Steuax" stuff .. now we want it to go back to that model?
As DHS said, yes. I would look to pass prices in the 2008-2013 timeframe or so. $900-1,000 got you a season pass to most decent areas. Other places had lower pricepoint options. Sugarbush, for example, had a pass option (Mount Ellen) for $499, another for $719 or so, and one at $950. What did not exist were multimountain discount passes.So have we ever had the happy medium then? And who's medium are we judging it by? For some, these multi-pass products work out well. For others they want their home mountain ski-on on Saturdays but a price they deem reasonable. Its hard.
Yeah, but what is the point of doing that? I think that the perspective that a lot of us are operating with is the old model of "one pass, one mountain." So maybe we just aren't seeing your POV of doing multiple mountains in a season. If you want to do that, then I guess you could do an Epic and MC option.I am a weekend warrior mostly (except for this year) so believe me, don't love the idea of adding more crowds to my experience, but there are lots of options now. With the Epic prices there are combinations where you could throw in an Indy pass or an IKON pass, or the MC and be close or even below where you were for some single mountain passes, no?
Absolutely...And I much prefer a renewal discount model like Ikon rather than a "discount for everyone" model like Epic. At least the renewal discount model makes me feel like the company values and wants to reward my loyalty (whether that is actually true or not is another topic). To me the "everyone gets a discount" model is a slap in the face to loyal passholders.Did anyone notice the price reduction is for everyone, not just for previous passholder renewing?
If you wonder how much Vail care about its customers, you have your answers right there.
Yeah I think that's the fundamental difference... those who are locked into a home mountain and then those that aren't that like the multi-mountain flexibility. I get all the reasons this sucks if you are worried about your home mountain getting more crowded. And I am probably more on that side, being critical of this move, especially for it being open to everyone and not a renewal discount. Was just pointing out that 1K priced passes got a lot of groans for a long time on here.As DHS said, yes. I would look to pass prices in the 2008-2013 timeframe or so. $900-1,000 got you a season pass to most decent areas. Other places had lower pricepoint options. Sugarbush, for example, had a pass option (Mount Ellen) for $499, another for $719 or so, and one at $950. What did not exist were multimountain discount passes.
Yeah, but what is the point of doing that? I think that the perspective that a lot of us are operating with is the old model of "one pass, one mountain." So maybe we just aren't seeing your POV of doing multiple mountains in a season. If you want to do that, then I guess you could do an Epic and MC option.
You are right that $1,000 passes were once deemed expensive. But, as things go, it seemed that they moved from the $750-800 range up to $1,000 as the economy rebounded.Yeah I think that's the fundamental difference... those who are locked into a home mountain and then those that aren't that like the multi-mountain flexibility. I get all the reasons this sucks if you are worried about your home mountain getting more crowded. And I am probably more on that side, being critical of this move, especially for it being open to everyone and not a renewal discount. Was just pointing out that 1K priced passes got a lot of groans for a long time on here.
Loyalty. That is the the argument that a lot of local passholders raise in response to their home resort joining Ikon or Epic. As in, "I'm loyal to you, why can't you be loyal to me?" I don't think that loyalty counts for much anymore. Both Alterra and Vail are competing with one another. Most big resorts have taken sides. The sheer volume of passes sold and the macro economics is more important to these companies than loyalty it seems. Maybe I am wrong.Absolutely...And I much prefer a renewal discount model like Ikon rather than a "discount for everyone" model like Epic. At least the renewal discount model makes me feel like the company values and wants to reward my loyalty (whether that is actually true or not is another topic). To me the "everyone gets a discount" model is a slap in the face to loyal passholders.
and/or the growth in membership/pass sales, will charge the stock price whether gross revenue increases or not.Vail is strategizing that by lowering pass prices and therefore increasing the number of daily visitors that ancillary revenue producing departments (F&B, Lodging, Rentals, Lessons) will more than offset their 20% discounting of pass prices.
These are higher margin areas I suspect.
Loyalty. That is the the argument that a lot of local passholders raise in response to their home resort joining Ikon or Epic. As in, "I'm loyal to you, why can't you be loyal to me?" I don't think that loyalty counts for much anymore. Both Alterra and Vail are competing with one another. Most big resorts have taken sides. The sheer volume of passes sold and the macro economics is more important to these companies than loyalty it seems. Maybe I am wrong.