Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
I don't think the vert is the key part of his arguement, it's the actual terrain. ie. 1000 vert of interesting skiing trumps 3000 vert groomers. I would ski the Palavacini chair anyday at A-Basin, which is maybe 1600 vert, then do top to bottom 4K vert runs at Snowmass.
I think the same arguement could be made for total acreage as well.
Have you ever skied 3k vert and not found interesting terrain?
Did you enjoy sugarloaf?
Yeah - but sometimes only in the first 1500 feet... And that my contain some of the most kick ass terrain ever... And it may be serviced by a chair... So why waste the time and energy to go all the way to the bottom..?
Agree.
Supreme chair at alta is 900-1000 vert and I used to ski that chair all day.
good one... We need to ride.. Deadheads think alike...
I've skied top to bottom at most place I go to out west.. But I only do it at the end of the day..
For me personaly - i find the bottom of most mountains pretty boring.. Like Jackson.. Or Kicking Horse.. Or Big Sky... Or Blackcomb... I could go on... Hell - even Bellayre bores me past the middle station...
Maybe I just got middle station issues...
Yeah - but sometimes only in the first 1500 feet... And that my contain some of the most kick ass terrain ever... And it may be serviced by a chair... So why waste the time and energy to go all the way to the bottom..?
good one... We need to ride.. Deadheads think alike...
I've skied top to bottom at most place I go to out west.. But I only do it at the end of the day..
For me personaly - i find the bottom of most mountains pretty boring.. Like Jackson.. Or Kicking Horse.. Or Big Sky... Or Blackcomb... I could go on... Hell - even Bellayre bores me past the middle station...
Maybe I just got middle station issues...
I wouldn't quite call the Hobacks boring. Not my very favorite style of terrain, but boring?
Considering the Hobacks have pretty much every style of terrain other than manmade features, have you ever even been in them? They're a consistent 3k vert of 30-35 degree pitch (with gully walls giving you 4-5 turns at 50 plus), with trees, cliffs, powder fields, moguls, anything you can think of. Theres even natural halfpipes down in the lower third.
Ski them on a 12" in pow day and youll never be satisfied with another run again anywhere else.
Considering the Hobacks have pretty much every style of terrain other than manmade features, have you ever even been in them? They're a consistent 3k vert of 30-35 degree pitch (with gully walls giving you 4-5 turns at 50 plus), with trees, cliffs, powder fields, moguls, anything you can think of. Theres even natural halfpipes down in the lower third.
Ski them on a 12" in pow day and youll never be satisfied with another run again anywhere else.
Enough about Jackson Hole..
Anybody else want to comment on why Iceface and Blow-kemo are inferior to the best resorts in the east???:dunce:
If you had ever skied WF we would have alot more respect for your opinion.
Stop taking the bait, HPD. The cheesy one is just trying to get a rise out of you.
Stop taking the bait, HPD. The cheesy one is just trying to get a rise out of you.
I know, I know, but doesn't it bother anyone that he says he skied there and never did? Why? To impress who?
I guess I should ask myself why do I care?
BS artists just rub me the wrong way.