BenedictGomez
Well-known member
Not so much to protect Alterra but to make member mountain disbursements and the books easier.
I dont think either of those things are true.
One, I'd be shocked if a major point of the wholly-owned subsidiary isnt to help deflect liability, and on your second point, I dont understand what you're saying. I work for a company that sells hundreds of products, some with complicated royalties (i.e. much more difficult than lift ticket disbursements), and I cant think of a reason why having a separate "Inc." would make the books any easier. Frankly, it actually complicates things via duplication.
EDIT: This got me thinking though. Could Vail do this too, and if so, have they created an off balance sheet entity? That could be a bit more interesting given they're a publicly traded compnay. Hmmm.....
Last edited: