St. Bear
New member
Especially since a lot of the ridging that brought the intense cold is often responsible for storms missing the 40/70 benchmark for big storms.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Especially since a lot of the ridging that brought the intense cold is often responsible for storms missing the 40/70 benchmark for big storms.
This will be the third season I've followed this weather sub-forum. All of my meteorological knowledge has come from here. That being said... please translate into somewhat-laymen's terms that are above Weather Channel terminology but below the level of BenedictGomez and the like.
This is my understanding of it. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Look at this pic
http://apps.startribune.com/blogs/user_images/500Tue.jpg
Don't pay attention to the exact location of the Low, but look how it creates front lines that run up the East Coast. That's how you get big storms in this part of the country. It pulls cold air from Canada at the same time that it pulls moisture from the ocean.
If you move that low a hundred miles or so East, and New England is no longer in the vertical front lines, the air will be colder, but the front will block access to the moisture and most of the storm will be pushed out to sea. So you may get some snow, but not the blockbuster storms.
This is also partly responsible for why Southern New England has done so well the past few years. The low was over northern/central New England, and southern area was located at the front boundaries.
I love the economic forecast that goes along with this. They could add with the sucky winter forecast for 2015-16 that winter clothing and equipment will see record low prices for spring 2016!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVxZe82uy4Y
This forecast Sucks! The've been right alot but there due for a screw up. Pattern has Alaska in a cold pattern, no accounting for the blob.
Especially since a lot of the ridging that brought the intense cold is often responsible for storms missing the 40/70 benchmark for big storms.
Good point. Having as active a jet stream as last year but with less cold would make for an interesting winter in the mountains. I would bet places closer to the coast that got piles of snow last year will get their fair share of both rain and snow in an active pattern. Who knows though it could be super cold and DC gets crushed.
Just as long as the less cold does not translate into January thaws. That is what was great about last season - minimal thawing.
So you want your cake and to eat it too?
Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone mobile app
She'll be comin' round the mountain when she comes...
She'll be comin' round the mountain when she comes...
View attachment 17612
View attachment 17613
View attachment 17614