JerseyJoey
New member
You are joking, right? I, and I think most people on here would agree, that additional trails are preferable to widening them. However, clearly widening a trail does add acreage, and at least to some degree spreads people out.
Hardly a joke at all.
What widening trails does is remove skiable acreage of trees. That's not a trade off I'm in favor of.
At many areas, skiable acreage is boundry to boundary. Taking away 5 acres of tree skiing to add 5 acres of trail skiing is not increasing skiable acreage. It's a wash, and I am def not in favor of that trade off. Trees are much better.
A perfect example at Killington is Big Dipper/ Double Dipper. You cut the super-highway by splitting Dipper trees in half. You did not increase skaible acreage. All you did was F up a really sweet tree run by cutting it in half. Skiable acreage remained exactly the same.