The ones before POWDR?
Seriously? People were absolutely rioting the last few years of ASC. Couldnt WAIT (warp thats for you) to get rid of them.
Watch what you wish for.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
The ones before POWDR?
The ones before POWDR?
How is powdr's track record at other resorts? Keeping folks happy?
As noted earlier though, in this instance we don't care about the remuneration, we want POWDR to modify their business model so that it better accounts for the potential costs of buyer dissatisfaction. Even the threat of a lawsuit is sufficient to do that.
Nobody's complaining about Killington. They're complaining about POWDR.What you seem to be saying is: for all its faults, you still haven't found a better option than Killington. I mean, if there were something better, a far more sensible approach would be to take your skiing dollars elsewhere.
I mean, if I'm served a poor dinner at a local restaurant, I don't sue or complain about the business model. I just go to another restaurant next time. There are plenty of great restaurants. I don't waste time bemoaning the bad ones.
All of this griping about Killington suggests a contradiction: although it's not what we want, it's still better than most (or indeed all) of the alternatives.
Nobody's complaining about Killington. They're complaining about POWDR.
The ones before POWDR?
For the foreseeable future, they're one and the same.
So because it's a great mountain, we should just bend over and take it from the guys that run it?For the foreseeable future, they're one and the same.
Well, they're still sending all their money out West. It's a nice new 6 pack that Copper's getting. At this point I'm guessing nothing more than a coat of paint and new mulch this summer for Killington, given that they only have a couple weeks before pass prices go up. Doubling prices has the effect of reducing crowding. Plus I didn't join the board until after POWDR took over, so I've seen a massive increase in displeasure with the new guys relative to ASC. :razz:As I recall, it was too crowded, the early season options have stunk since K-1 went in, all the money that ASC was making back East was being shipped out West, etc, etc, etc
Hey, I'm just making an empirical observation. If there were something much better than POWDR is now offering at Killington, you'd just go there, and say, "Bye, bye." The same as if you get poor service at a restaurant, a gas station, a shoe store, or a movie theater. If you don't like one, there are many others.So because it's a great mountain, we should just bend over and take it from the guys that run it?
This isn't about them closing down Bear a week earlier than they should've one time. This is about a continuous display of apathy towards their season pass holders, and a lack of understanding their market.
What you seem to be saying is: for all its faults, you still haven't found a better option than Killington. I mean, if there were something better, a far more sensible approach would be to take your skiing dollars elsewhere.
I mean, if I'm served a poor dinner at a local restaurant, I don't sue or complain about the business model. I just go to another restaurant next time. There are plenty of great restaurants. I don't waste time bemoaning the bad ones.
All of this griping about Killington suggests a contradiction: although it's not what we want, it's still better than most (or indeed all) of the alternatives.
I don't really care about May 8th skiing, my ski house lease is up May 1st anyways. I don't think there's enough of a market for skiing beyond probably next weekend in the East to make more than a few areas profitable, and only enough for 1 after May 1st. But their overall operations (closing early their first year of ownership, closing with full coverage on Superstar last year based on a weather forecast a couple weeks out, schizo approaches to grooming and snowmaking, killing BMMC, the list goes on) are widely perceived to display a lack of understanding of the local market and ignoring the desires of customers. Running the SPQ for one additional weekend would have done wonders in reversing that sentiment.Hey, I'm just making an empirical observation. If there were something much better than POWDR is now offering at Killington, you'd just go there, and say, "Bye, bye." The same as if you get poor service at a restaurant, a gas station, a shoe store, or a movie theater. If you don't like one, there are many others.
The reason you feel so passionately about Killington is that, despite what POWDR has done, better options don't really exist. Even in its curtailed state, Killington is still better than most or all of the relevant competition.
And if POWDR doesn't understand the market, apparently their competitors don't either. If Killington were getting it wrong, you'd think it creates an opportunity for smarter operators to make money off of POWDR's foolishness. And yet, practically the whole East Coast plans to be closed by May 1, if they haven't already. The only exceptions are much farther north of Killington, and will be open for just a couple of extra weekends, at most.
As a skier, I would much prefer to see Killington open as late in the year as there is snow cover. But I'm not at all convinced that POWDR is getting it wrong from a business perspective (and they are, after all, a business). There's no great evidence of a lucrative ski market in the Northeast past April.
I hear Highway Star is going to be skiing at Sunday River next year.
Sigh..if only. Then I learn how to do a ski-off proper. I've been reading this thread with interest and, it occurred to me this morning, that the SR skiers who post here have been downright content over the years compared to the Kmart folks.
There may be more K skiers here, therefore more opinions. Or the SR people may be less demanding (it's the Maine in them). Maybe SR just understands their clientele better.
Sigh..if only. Then I learn how to do a ski-off proper. I've been reading this thread with interest and, it occurred to me this morning, that the SR skiers who post here have been downright content over the years compared to the Kmart folks.
There may be more K skiers here, therefore more opinions. Or the SR people may be less demanding (it's the Maine in them). Maybe SR just understands their clientele better.
Sigh..if only. Then I learn how to do a ski-off proper. I've been reading this thread with interest and, it occurred to me this morning, that the SR skiers who post here have been downright content over the years compared to the Kmart folks.
There may be more K skiers here, therefore more opinions. Or the SR people may be less demanding (it's the Maine in them). Maybe SR just understands their clientele better.
Serious question here. Does anyone REALLY know if the "old" K model of late season "ski until total meltout" operations was VERY profitable vs. "just break even"???
Probably not. Not even ASC or POWDR, I'd guess. But what's the cost of running 1 lift, 5 hours a day (10-3), for two days? 3 people staffing for 6 hours @ $20/ hour (including overhead,) call it $800 in staffing. 900hp motor, 12 hours of operation, $0.25/kw-hr, $2K. Throw in another $1K in there for whatever. Under $5K for the weekend. What the hell, double it. $10K.Serious question here. Does anyone REALLY know if the "old" K model of late season "ski until total meltout" operations was VERY profitable vs. "just break even"???
Serious question here. Does anyone REALLY know if the "old" K model of late season "ski until total meltout" operations was VERY profitable vs. "just break even"???