• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

critiqued by a ski instructor...wigglers unite!

tmcc71

New member
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
180
Points
0
I was skiing with a ski instructor friend the other day at a small local mountain (Wachusett).
I have been skiing for 25 years or so. I am approaching 40 years old. I ski about 100 days a year and consider myself a modest advanced skiier. I can ski most terrain except moguls and huge powder. My technique is decidedly old school, especially for a modern ski. I currently use Head Monster 72's (waist). I like to carve tight turns as i ski. I do this not to show off, but because it is great fun and good exercise. I like the feeling of the edges changing effortlessly on a good ski.
well, last Saturday the ski instructor i was hanging out with kind of tore apart my style. She went as far as making fun of my style and calling me a "Wachusett Wiggler", She told me to widen my stance shoulder width and pointed out people doing it correctly and people who were doing what i do (wiggling). I pointed out the people with the wider stance looked ok, but the people with the narrower stance looked to have more control and skill. I was trying to be objective and asked people riding the lifts with me the rest of the day to observe people and tell me who they thought had the greater skill level. It wasn't even close, the "wigglers" won hands down. Most people I asked cleary identified the older style (more parallel) skiiers were the more skilled out of the two. I tried the other stance and I felt I had plenty of control, but it was not even close to as fun. So, my long winded conclusion.....I am going to ski the way i enjoy. I wonder how many people like me are secretly made fun of by the new wave of ski instructors because of an old school style? I think i'll continue to wiggle my way down the mountain with pride. Maybe i'll start a wigglers 12 step program. Hi, my name is Tim and i'm a wiggler....
 

BushMogulMaster

Industry Rep
Industry Rep
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
1,815
Points
48
Location
Leadville, CO
I'm a mogul skier. I ski short-radius mogul turns on the flats. I'm on basically straight skis (92-66-82). I get made fun of all the time. I don't even care. What usually pisses the people off who make fun of me is that I'm perfectly capable of ripping a GS turn on my mogul skis. :D
 

kingslug

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
7,309
Points
113
Location
Draper utah
Wigglers usualy do better in the bumps and trees, therefore IMHO they are better. The minute I started to put my feet closer together, moguls got a hell of a lot easier. Glen Plake said it best: " if you want to find the best skiers on the mountain, you might want to look in the bumps".
 

sledhaulingmedic

New member
Joined
Jun 21, 2004
Messages
1,425
Points
0
Given the new twist on the term "wide stance" (thanks to the congessman from Idaho), I might prefer to "wiggle" too!

I've generally opened up over the years (mostly as I've gone to more agressively cut skis). My stance varies with the terrain, conditions, speed and radius of turn. All that said, I ski ugly. I get down just about anything and don't fall much.
 

campgottagopee

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
3,771
Points
0
Location
Virgil
Given the new twist on the term "wide stance" (thanks to the congessman from Idaho), I might prefer to "wiggle" too!

I've generally opened up over the years (mostly as I've gone to more agressively cut skis). My stance varies with the terrain, conditions, speed and radius of turn. All that said, I ski ugly. I get down just about anything and don't fall much.

Basher here too---I ski with a bunch of "pretty boys" who call me the bull in the china shop once they catch up to me:p
 

Skier75

New member
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
565
Points
0
Location
Barrington, New Hampshire
I found that when I emulated a good friend of mine skiing, I did much better. I copied everything about him when I followed him and I could ski faster and in more control. Did this for a few years, before I realized what it was. Feet closer together! Guess I'm a wiggler, and a hppy one at that. When I realized this last year, skiing got to be sooooo much more fun than it already was. I used to ski Like Bode, feet way apart. Nowadays, they are pretty close together.
 
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
17,569
Points
0
That sounds like the Pocono shuffle..with wider shaped skis..I have a much wider stance than I used to on straight skis. Skiing old school style on modern skis is a liability..a wider stance will give you more angulation and you can push your skis to the max..It's always nice to get free advice. I've gotten plenty from racer friends.
 

wa-loaf

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
15,109
Points
48
Location
Mordor
You should tailor your stance to what you are doing. There's no catch-all position. If you are making short turns, skiing bumps or the trees you need a tight stance. Medium to long radius turns are better done with a wider stance. Mix it up, don't be a one trick pony.
 

bigbog

Active member
Joined
Feb 17, 2004
Messages
4,882
Points
38
Location
Bangor and the state's woodlands
...

I think there's often a need for a little rotary here & there....but I think(my $.02) the increased sidecut skis offers the skier even more tools, particularly in exploring off-piste uneven terrain. With your experience Tim...try mixing it up a little. Wa-Loaf said it....mix it up... Particularly with some of the more exciting dimensions...it really seems to open up new & fun territory...
 
Last edited:

2knees

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,330
Points
0
Location
Safe
Bvibert and i had this exact kind of conversation at mt snow on wednesday. I just cant ski with me feet apart like that. right or wrong, i just stick to what i know.
 

Sky

Active member
Joined
Apr 15, 2005
Messages
1,426
Points
38
Location
South Central Massachusetts
As for "how it looks" and "who looks more skilled"...I ski with two guys who are very good, one with each style.

The wide stance guys is a master's level racer. Wide stance. He looks very skilled.

The other guy varies his stance. He just two years ago dropped the long skinny skis and loves his new shaped skis. He races well (gold) in the night league and has a relatively wide stance in the course...bt when he free skis, he frequently opts back to teh "parallel" look and is very graceful about it.

I like the look of the "wigglers" I guess. I'm just happy to be a skier, regardless of the style.
 

sledhaulingmedic

New member
Joined
Jun 21, 2004
Messages
1,425
Points
0
I've found that the PSIA teaching style is much about "their way", and less about really functional skiing. Ask a PSIA instructor about how to ski bumps, they don't have an answer. Ask about crud, or pow. Prolly same deal. How to rip corduroy on shaped skis? They have the answer.

I didn't quite realize just how narrow the PSIA aproach is until talking with several instructors and then taking a lesson at a non-PSIA ski school (Snow King, WY).

PSIA is not the only way.
 
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
17,569
Points
0
Bvibert and i had this exact kind of conversation at mt snow on wednesday. I just cant ski with me feet apart like that. right or wrong, i just stick to what i know.

What about when you make a sharp turn, like cutting a corner? Tomorrow when I ski groomers, crud, and bumps....I'll be paying extra attention to my stance..I really haven't thought about it much..except when I see Gregs videos where he skis like there're bumps even when there aren't any. I sometimes do that and see if I can make 100 turns on a mile long trail..I think my best is around 115 turns..but that's complete turns so 115..right(wiggles) and 115 left(wiggles)..that's how your legs get hella solid and ready for Jackson Hole...:daffy:
 

snoseek

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Messages
6,441
Points
113
Location
NH
Ski however you ski and don't let anyone tell you its wrong. There is no right/wrong, skiing (or boarding)is such a personal experience that others really don't matter. If you want to take it to a different level, than find an instructor that feels this way too.
 

millerm277

Active member
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
1,804
Points
38
Location
NJ/NH
Personally, I just go with whatever comes naturally...whether I look good while skiing or not, I have no idea, but I do know that my way results in me not falling much, and being able to safely and quickly ski everything I've encountered so far.
 

2knees

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,330
Points
0
Location
Safe
Personally, I just go with whatever comes naturally...whether I look good while skiing or not, I have no idea, but I do know that my way results in me not falling much, and being able to safely and quickly ski everything I've encountered so far.

lol well i cant say my style prevents me from falling alot.

Campgottagopee, i think you hit the nail on the head. :smile:
 

Greg

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 1, 2001
Messages
31,154
Points
0
It's my impression that the newer ski technology let's folks ski more fluidly and smoother with a wider stance. My stance was pretty wide up until last year when I made a concerted effort to tighten it up, mostly to help in the bumps. Now I hear my skis clanging together all the time and the tips on my Cabrawlers (bump skis) are already starting to wear, after only 2 days on them. The tighter stance helps me in the powder as well. I normally make quick short radius turns, and very rarely carve so I like to keep the feet pretty close together.
 

snoseek

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Messages
6,441
Points
113
Location
NH
I personally try to adjust the way i ski to the conditions. bumps and powder close together, groomers and speed a wider stance. My everday ski has very less sidecut than most, I think maybe a deep sidecut kind of forces a wide stance (i'm probably wrong about this). More often than not i really don't care because i'm just not very analytical and a bit lazy.
 
Top