• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

EVs - New Hampshire gets it right

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,189
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
It's bias alright, but not mine. Frankly, even a majority of Democrats in polls believe the media is biased in favor of Democrats, so I'm surprised you seem to think this is some sort of crazy talk. And examples are everywhere if you s

Democrats tend to "act" and "move", but in the news Republicans "pounce" and "seize".

When a Republican does something bad the headline is always, "Republican Senator Smith" or "GOP Representative Smith", but when a Democrat does something bad it's usually just Senator Smith or Representative Smith.

And it's amazing how many "far-right" politicians there are in Washington, but there never seems to be "far-left" politicians, not even AOC, Pelosi or Omar. Funny that.


Lol

Okay bud. Yup Fox is so much more "fair and balanced" than CNN etc al. And OAN and Newsmax? Totally reputable.

But I don't really care about any of this stuff like you and conservatives cry about all of the time. That's my point, not that you or I are right about media bias; but that you guys always cry about it.

Carry on
 

1dog

Active member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
644
Points
43
Just to give some age identity to those viewers with the 'alphabet; networks. Average age of viewers 68 year old ( Faux.PMSNBC.CNN, etc)
Tucker. had $20M job and 4-5M viewers * mainly in that age group) now- 5.10. up to 20X the viewers on Twit. And far broader audience demographically.

Not so with Don Lemon ( who was released the same day - and they texted each other apparently) Platforms change- cable is the newspapers of the '2000's- dying faster than well, 69 year olds. . . .

Back to our EV show: https://cleantechnica.com/2023/09/22/us-electric-car-sales-up-147-since-2021/
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,364
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
Okay bud. Yup Fox is so much more "fair and balanced" than CNN etc al. And OAN and Newsmax? Totally reputable.

OAN? Newsmax? These are completely irrelevant organizations in terms of breadth, hits, reach etc.... I've literally never watched 1 second of any OAN or Newsmax broadcast, and I suspect most here would say the same. Hell, I bet most Americans dont even know what they are! You've inadvertently helped prove my point given that's the best you can do.
 

Harvey

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
1,299
Points
83
Location
North River, NY
Website
nyskiblog.com
The OWNERS of media have a huge impact on the POV of the outlet. NYT, WSJ, FOX, NBC. The fact set is another story.

Each side is working with a different set of facts. And those facts generally aren't adopted or rejected by the public based on real research. We seem to choose our fact set based on which set we believe is consistent with the survival of our own way of life going forward.

You may think that is a partisan statement but you might also find some on each side actually agree on it, as stated.

One big reason we have different fact sets is because media is very fragmented. When I was a kid there were two or three guys on TV telling the facts, like Cronkite. And generally we all accepted those facts. On the day Kennedy was shot, nobody was speculating that it didn't actually happen. Even if our opinions differed we were tethered to the same fact pole.

Now, with all the fragmentation, the only way to really be profitable is to be extreme. CNN "tries" to be more middle vs MSNBC or FOX, and because of it, IMO, they have the smallest audience of the three. IMO it's an advantage for the consumer to having two left outlets. You get to see both far left and moderate left POVs.

Benedict is right, there are less offerings on the right. For heavy hitters (big audiences) in the US, it's FOX and maybe WSJ or NY Post. Those outlets are freer to choose their own lane, and the extreme sells, satisfying the shareholders. FOX, as a solo act, has a much bigger audience than CNN or NBC. IMO if one of the other smaller right networks could start to compete with FOX, in the long run the two would try to differentiate themselves, forcing one of them toward the middle.
 
Last edited:

BodeMiller1

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 7, 2022
Messages
2,025
Points
63
Location
Montpelier
There are 15 or so EVs and hybrids in front of the New Hampshire Statehouse. I go a Audi Matchbox car?

Not Good.

The people selling the cars seemed to be in favor of selling them. :unsure: No one knows why.
 

1dog

Active member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
644
Points
43
There are 15 or so EVs and hybrids in front of the New Hampshire Statehouse. I go a Audi Matchbox car?

Not Good.

The people selling the cars seemed to be in favor of selling them. :unsure: No one knows why.
I used to love Ace Frehley . . . in high school. . . . . he played a mean lead. Back to our show?
 

IceEidolon

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 10, 2017
Messages
584
Points
63
It's bias alright, but not mine. Frankly, even a majority of Democrats in polls believe the media is biased in favor of Democrats, so I'm surprised you seem to think this is some sort of crazy talk. And examples are everywhere if you simply look:

Democrats tend to "act" and "move", but in the news Republicans "pounce" and "seize".

When a Republican does something bad the headline is always, "Republican Senator Smith" or "GOP Representative Smith", but when a Democrat does something bad it's usually just Senator Smith or Representative Smith.

And it's amazing how many "far-right" politicians there are in Washington, but there never seems to be "far-left" politicians, not even AOC, Pelosi or Omar. Funny that.
Do you want us to import and elect some actual radical left politicians from Europe? I think the diversity would to us good, personally, since we definitely do have an active elected radical right.

Our "radical left" of Bernie and AOC and company that actually hold office are tepid moderates if you actually have representation across the political spectrum.

As for bias in media, you're seeing things. https://theconversation.com/republi...ies-that-clearly-favor-the-other-party-192282 You and everyone else, though, don't feel special.
 
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Messages
68
Points
18
It's bias alright, but not mine. Frankly, even a majority of Democrats in polls believe the media is biased in favor of Democrats, so I'm surprised you seem to think this is some sort of crazy talk. And examples are everywhere if you simply look:

Democrats tend to "act" and "move", but in the news Republicans "pounce" and "seize".

When a Republican does something bad the headline is always, "Republican Senator Smith" or "GOP Representative Smith", but when a Democrat does something bad it's usually just Senator Smith or Representative Smith.

And it's amazing how many "far-right" politicians there are in Washington, but there never seems to be "far-left" politicians, not even AOC, Pelosi or Omar. Funny that.

Well I'm convinced.

This should end well.

Not trying to "convince" anyone of anything, just stating what the data has shown for years now.

Honestly? I thought this was generally common knowledge.

View attachment 59105
That poll does not support the idea that a majority of Democrats believe the media is biased in their favor.
 
Last edited:

Dickc

Active member
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
575
Points
43
Location
Northeast Mass
This whole thread is pretty funny. We went from NH EV's to low flush Toilets!

FWIW, I have done multiple renovations and tried many toilets, My favorite is the American Standard. They can handle pretty much anything that passes through my body! :)

In my parents house they had the VERY EARLY version of low flush - they were awful. Literally would have to flush 3+ times to clear the stuff. God help me if I had corn on the cobb the night before.
Just keep a bucket in the bathroom, fill it from the tub, and "augment" the flush.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,364
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
That poll does not support the idea that a majority of Democrats believe the media is biased in their favor.

In a literal sense you're correct in that that's not what the poll was powered to do, but if you understand US voter Demographics you really don't need to be able to explode Gallup's internal data & see their methodology, to understand a solid chunk of Democrats agreed. Why? Because there are far more Democrats in America than Republicans, so to account for that Gallup (and all other credible polling agencies) has to over-sample more Democrats than Republicans. So to get a 64% result, even if you assume the GOP tally was very high in the affirmative, like 80%, you'd still need a pretty high Democrat cohort to agree with them to hit 64%. I actually worked for a polling body for 6 months, it's even more boring than it sounds.

EDIT: Looking at the title though, it's worded "Americans", whereas IMO it really should say, "politically affiliated Americans" given it doesn't include independents.
 
Last edited:

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,364
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
Just keep a bucket in the bathroom, fill it from the tub, and "augment" the flush.

That's a "solution" of sorts, but WTH wants to do that? FYI, my four year old clogged a toilet yesterday just by peeing, and then putting in way too much toilet-paper, but really not enough that should have required me to get the plunger. I hate these things, so I really hope the poster who claims the low-flush technology has advanced leaps & bounds in the last 5 to 10 years is correct.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,364
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
15 threads of political argument later, this is why Granite1 should have been banned from this forum a long time ago.

You know what's truly fascinating, after starting this thread he hasnt returned to it for even a single comment (see below). Master troll?

1695526265095.png
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,364
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
I liked BG's Jetsons reference a few pages back.

Just wait for when the masses figure that out in about 2 years or so. Gonna' be some shocked peeps & a real "oh s**t" moment.


I think the ban plastic straws & own rain barrels & home composting folks will be particularly angry. Anyone in this industry is already well-aware, just silent. There's a reason Elon Musk is currently desperately trying to become battery self-sufficient (or at least as much as possible). From the western perspective, TSLA is far ahead of the curve.
 
Last edited:

BodeMiller1

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 7, 2022
Messages
2,025
Points
63
Location
Montpelier
Do you want us to import and elect some actual radical left politicians from Europe? I think the diversity would to us good, personally, since we definitely do have an active elected radical right.

Our "radical left" of Bernie and AOC and company that actually hold office are tepid moderates if you actually have representation across the political spectrum.

As for bias in media, you're seeing things. https://theconversation.com/republi...ies-that-clearly-favor-the-other-party-192282 You and everyone else, though, don't feel special.
At the end of the day all communists, their children and sympathizers have to be killed. Sad but true.
 
Top