kbroderick
Active member
The difference from the airplane analogy is that it's more akin to adding more safety features to airplanes even while we have plenty flying around that lack those features. Computer-driven cars don't have to be safe to be an improvement; they only need to be safer than human-driven cars. More to the point, they only need to be safer than a car driven by the average human paying an average amount of attention to the task at hand.Well good for Waymo!
To me, this all smacks of flying the airplane while you're building it. So, I'll stay safe and refrain from visiting LA, San Francisco, Phoenix, and Austin. Not looking to get taken out by a Waymo driverless vehicle.
Too bad, Phoenix is a lovely city. The other cities you couldn't pay me to visit.
Given how I feel about the average human driver these days, that doesn't seem a particularly high bar.