rob56789
Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2006
- Messages
- 168
- Points
- 16
i was looking for information on new skis i was planning on buying and i found this site
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
I stumbled upon it when i was yearning for anything skiing related. and i think AZ should develop its own myspace page
Myspace is so 2006..lol
It appears that the reason that TGR(a film company)and NELSAP(non profit organization with a defined mission) have their own pages is that they exist in the real world and AZ is only in the virtual world. Oh well.
:I have deleted the article, as it did not satisfy the [[WP:WEB|guidelines for websites]] nor likely will. Aside from that, there are no assertations of notability. Why is the website important in an encyclopedic context? Most likely it is not, and Wikipedia is not an internet yellow pages. Thanks for contributing, please read [[WP:ABOUT|what we're about]] to learn how you can help more in the future. [[User:Keegan|<font color="maroon">Keegan</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Keegan|<font color="gray">talk</font>]]</small></sup> 04:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Bob R
Let me quote them:
I seem to be SOL. I'm not sure why they consider NELSAP or TGR of encyclopedic relevance if AZ is not. Oh well.
Point them to the Ski Area Challenge. There's some unique value in that. In fact, there are some references to the forums and challenge on the Killington and Sugarbush Wikipedia pages. I can see how NELSAP and TGR are considered to have more encyclopedic relevance, especially NELSAP. The "not an internet yellow pages" comment was pretty dicky though.
I included an entire paragraph on this topic, mentioning the bigger names and areas involved. Apparently it's just not encyclopedic enough for them
brown noser..:dunce: