• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

If there were no snowmaking?

BigJay

New member
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
487
Points
0
Location
Jay Peak, VT
Following JD's thread...

Would you ski knowing that you would need to drive a lot more...
Skiing would be less convenient and accessible to most...

Would you still hit the slopes?
 

Hawkshot99

Active member
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
4,489
Points
36
Location
Poughkeepsie, NY
Yes I would, just no were near as much as I do now. I would drive farther(not too often) or wait till my local hill had enough like in the old days.
 

snowmonster

New member
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
4,066
Points
0
Location
In my mind, northern New England
Sunday River would still be closed, the season in the East would begin in mid-December and end in March, people on this board would get antsy-er and nastier as November wore on...not a pretty sight.
 

x10003q

Active member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
972
Points
43
Location
Bergen County, NJ
There would be many seasons where there would be about 10 days of skiing south of Albany. I would still drive for snow. Canada wold be a way more popular choice for US Eastern skiers.
 

BigJay

New member
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
487
Points
0
Location
Jay Peak, VT
There would be many seasons where there would be about 10 days of skiing south of Albany. I would still drive for snow. Canada wold be a way more popular choice for US Eastern skiers.

It snows a lot more in N. VT then anywhere in Quebec... Le Massif gets some good snow that N. VT sees in r*** but still... snow doesn't come as often. Then again, there is always the Chic-Chocs... but they're so far... and as much as i love it there, i prefer a bit less reliable but oh so more convenient snow!
 

ERJ-145CA

Well-known member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
2,027
Points
48
Location
Northwestern, NJ
Yeah I would still be skiing but a lot less often. In NJ there would probably be about 10 good ski days a winter without snowmaking so I'd have to drive much more than 15 minutes to ski.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
34,260
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
If there was no snowmaking, then the ski areas would be really different. I'm not sure if there would be more (because of lower overhead) or less (because of shorter seasons and less money). It is like farming in that you are at the mercy of mother nature, it takes a huge capital investment to build a ski area, and you make no money. Plus it takes a lot of land.
 

riverc0il

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2001
Messages
13,039
Points
0
Location
Ashland, NH
Website
www.thesnowway.com
Season would start later, would end a LOT sooner, but no change for natural snow on Mount Washington, so my season would not be shortened too much as I ski natural snow in October quite often. I would probably get about a half dozen less days per season without snow making. Maybe less people sliding as without snow making, it would be harder to get a groomed surface (at least early in the season before enough natural has landed on the ground to allow a groomed to smooth it out nicely). Narrower trails also. I suspect I could take the shortened season and slightly more uncertain conditions as a fair trade off for more natural snow trails, narrower trails, and likely fewer people on the slopes. As TB said... could be more or less areas. Without needing to "keep up with the Joneses," struggling areas like Magic would be on even footing with more dominant players in their regional area.
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,864
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
interesting question on the number of areas. I hadn't thought of that with the initial question. There were obviously many, many, more areas pre-snowmaking. With the modern desire for resort amenities, that probably wouldn't be the case today.
 

millerm277

Active member
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
1,823
Points
38
Location
NH
interesting question on the number of areas. I hadn't thought of that with the initial question. There were obviously many, many, more areas pre-snowmaking. With the modern desire for resort amenities, that probably wouldn't be the case today.

Hard to say. Even I, for most of my days of skiing, "need" snowmaking. I can't plan to visit Magic weeks in advance, like I can for Hunter or Killington. I know those areas will have something resembling snow all the time, if they didn't have that advantage, I probably would ski more places, as then Plattekill or Magic would almost be the better bet, from the lower traffic.
 

JD

New member
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
2,461
Points
0
Location
Northfield
Website
hotmail.com
Following JD's thread...

Would you ski knowing that you would need to drive a lot more...
Skiing would be less convenient and accessible to most...

Would you still hit the slopes?

I drive less since foresaking man made snow....
 
Top