There has been much attention to this guy:
You know...the young guy who was told he had a deadly form of TB and he decided to go against CDC orders and fly back to the U.S. He said his actions were justified because he was told that he was not contagious and that if he remained in Europe, he was probably going to die because treatment was not available.
So he bought a ticket to Montreal and drove back into the U.S.
This brings up the moral question: if you were in his position, knowing what he knew then, what would you have done? Would you have stayed? Flown back anyways? Did he put others at risk for no reason?
Let's see what you think....avoid politics, digs on lawyers, and cage training Zebras (which was mentioned in another thread as a hot topic I guess...).

You know...the young guy who was told he had a deadly form of TB and he decided to go against CDC orders and fly back to the U.S. He said his actions were justified because he was told that he was not contagious and that if he remained in Europe, he was probably going to die because treatment was not available.
So he bought a ticket to Montreal and drove back into the U.S.
This brings up the moral question: if you were in his position, knowing what he knew then, what would you have done? Would you have stayed? Flown back anyways? Did he put others at risk for no reason?
Let's see what you think....avoid politics, digs on lawyers, and cage training Zebras (which was mentioned in another thread as a hot topic I guess...).