• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Mountain vs. Hill?

In skiing and hiking, a "mountain" needs how much vertical feet to be considered a "m

  • 100-200 vertical feet

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 200-400 vertical feet

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 200-600 vertical feet

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 600-800 vertical feet

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1200-1400 vertical feet

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1400-1600 vertical feet

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1600-1800 vert

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1800-2000 vert

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Over 2000 vert

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Trailboss, Let my feet decide!

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    3

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,727
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
OK, this may seem confusing, but what I am asking is what makes a mountain a mountain?

As for me, well, I know that there is an official definition, but pretty much if a place has more than say, 500 feet, I could consider it to be a mountain.

But then again, it is relative. 500 vertical feet is not a lot in Vermont or NH, but is huge in CT.

Your musings? :)
 

bvibert

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
30,394
Points
38
Location
Torrington, CT
I don't pay much attention to vertical feet numbers. I guess its more of how it skis and looks. If you can see the top from the base of the chair lift then its probably a hill ;)
 

kfan

New member
Joined
Feb 1, 2004
Messages
16
Points
0
Location
New York
The first time I ever went skiing was on a 500 foot "mountain." It was out in the midwest and I had great time. (came back for more didn't I? )

However, since I've moved back to the Northeast, I wouldn't consider anything under 1,000 feet a mountain. When I look back on it, my first ski trip was on a hill, not a mountain. However, like trailboss says, it's relative.
 

Big Game

New member
Joined
Jul 26, 2004
Messages
277
Points
0
Location
Cruisy woods
It depends....

A hill is any gain in elevation that you use any type of motorized transport to ascend.

A mountain is a geological formation where you use your own power to get up.
 

Greg

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 1, 2001
Messages
31,154
Points
0
I haven't skied a sub-1000' mountain in a number of years so I voted 1000-1200 vertical feet. This may change as I plan to hit Sundown (625') a lot this season as a close to home option. However, I most enjoy runs in at least 1,000' increments.

For hiking, I would say 1,000' is another good minimum for a challenge.
 

bvibert

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
30,394
Points
38
Location
Torrington, CT
Greg said:
I haven't skied a sub-1000' mountain in a number of years so I voted 1000-1200 vertical feet. This may change as I plan to hit Sundown (625') a lot this season as a close to home option. However, I most enjoy runs in at least 1,000' increments.

For hiking, I would say 1,000' is another good minimum for a challenge.

If you head to Sundown let me know. I decided to get part-time/second job there this year. If would be nice to meet you!
 

Greg

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 1, 2001
Messages
31,154
Points
0
bvibert said:
If you head to Sundown let me know. I decided to get part-time/second job there this year. If would be nice to meet you!
Will do. It's only about a 35 minute drive and I plan to hit Sundown for quick ski jaunts and some night skiing. I'll try to touch base with you when I go.
 
Top