• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

The "Sugarbush Thread"

Getskied

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2014
Messages
52
Points
18
Pretty good day at Mt Ellen and typical conditions for January. Having North Ridge down seems kind of nostalgic.
Right? It’s nostalgic and basically normal at this point. I do wish that Sunny Q would get with the program though. The kids programs would benefit from the terrain it serves especially on a cold-ssa January day like today.

It’s low tide out there for sure although some nice turns to be had on trail. FIS skied quite nicely on either side of the whales.
 

Newpylong

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 20, 2005
Messages
5,285
Points
113
Location
Upper Valley, NH
Hypothetically: If you could snap your fingers and tomorrow, in place of NRX, there's a new, properly running fixed grip quad. Same alignment. Would you take that?
I know it wouldn't ever actually happen but I'm curious what people think. A slow but new and reliable North Ridge lift vs the current failure prone NRX and the prospect of (god only knows when) future replacement?🤔

At 5600+ rope length and as cold as that lift is? Hell no. Might as well ride down to GMX and then ride Summit.

Replace it with the correct lift in due time which is another HSQ.
 

djd66

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2015
Messages
1,045
Points
113
Hypothetically: If you could snap your fingers and tomorrow, in place of NRX, there's a new, properly running fixed grip quad. Same alignment. Would you take that?
I know it wouldn't ever actually happen but I'm curious what people think. A slow but new and reliable North Ridge lift vs the current failure prone NRX and the prospect of (god only knows when) future replacement?🤔
Horrible idea. When NRX is running properly, it’s my favorite lift on the mountain. All vertical, no runout,… a bazillion options- trees, moguls, cruisers.
 

HowieT2

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
1,696
Points
63
Hypothetically: If you could snap your fingers and tomorrow, in place of NRX, there's a new, properly running fixed grip quad. Same alignment. Would you take that?
I know it wouldn't ever actually happen but I'm curious what people think. A slow but new and reliable North Ridge lift vs the current failure prone NRX and the prospect of (god only knows when) future replacement?🤔
I would. Said same awhile ago but most responses were negative.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,741
Points
113
Location
NJ
In addition to the reasons already cited by newpy and djd, another reason that a replacement with a fixed grip chair would be a bad idea is it would send the message that ME is not important and a 2nd class citizen.
 

Newpylong

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 20, 2005
Messages
5,285
Points
113
Location
Upper Valley, NH
If we're talking about 2nd class citizens, it's also time to get Slidebrook Express into play. Pretending it's not there doesn't help anyone.

I was one of those punks at GMVS at the time in '95 and watched them fly the towers in. That lift ran every single day of the week when it wasn't arctic and there was enough snow (which seemed far less than what is claimed is necessary now) to get rescue in and out.
 
Last edited:

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,741
Points
113
Location
NJ
Don’t misunderstand me, I agree it should be a hs, but the current situation which has been an ongoing saga for many years, is intolerable.

Because for some reason everyone keeps thinking they have some great new way to "fix" it every year. Maybe they get it running smoothly the rest of the season and this becomes moot. But I have my doubts.

I agree it is ridiculous at this point, but putting in a fixed grip replacement is a long-term bad investment that we'll all be stuck with for a much longer time than simply waiting for a proper replacement.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,741
Points
113
Location
NJ
If we're talking about 2nd class citizens, it's also time to get Slidebrook Express into play. Pretending it's not there doesn't help anyone.

I was one of those punks at GMVS at the time in '95 and watched them fly the towers in. That lift ran every single day of the week when it wasn't arctic and there was enough snow (which seemed far less than what is claimed is necessary now) to get rescue in and out.

To be fair, CR isn't even running yet and that is higher elevation than the service roads in Slide Brook. I don't think they're just pretending it isn't there.
 

SkiingInABlueDream

Active member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
832
Points
28
Location
the woods of greater-Waltham
It sounds like some of you may have answered a different question than what I actually asked. OBVIOUSLY NR as a high speed is ideal and what we all want. But the reality is that, in the more general sense, when you currently don't have what you want, and it's unknown when or even if you'll ever get it, you become increasingly open to lesser options, because usually a lesser-something is better than nothing. (You may want filet mignon but if you're really hungry McDonalds can be very satisfying.) My takeaway from the replies so far is that either you're not hungry enough or are content not eating (for now).😉

edit. That said, I asked for opinions... and you gave'em😅
 

SkiingInABlueDream

Active member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
832
Points
28
Location
the woods of greater-Waltham
Maybe I should have phrased the question this way: Would you rather have a new well-running FGQ at NR, or nothing. NRX is gone. Terminals, towers, everything, gone. No other option. Do you choose A or B?

edit. And FWIW I'm not saying I that I think they should actually put an FGQ there.
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2022
Messages
15
Points
13
Rumor alert. I overheard 2 guys on the lift last week chatting about them taking down NR end of this season. One of the guys referenced a discussion he had with management about this and when it was going to be made public or how long they can keep it from going public.

Doesn't make sense why they would do this without a replacement unless it needs capex they aren't prepared for. Again just a rumor.

It certainly would go a long way to get some communication from management and Alterra about what the next several years look like. Would make it easier to absorb the painful short term if there is a commitment to make improvements that is just over the horizon.
 

SkiingInABlueDream

Active member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
832
Points
28
Location
the woods of greater-Waltham
At 5600+ rope length and as cold as that lift is? Hell no. Might as well ride down to GMX and then ride Summit.
I agree it'd be quite long but I think Id still rather sit on a FG NR than take those 2 lifts. That and Summit itself already is equally chilly.
edit. Well, I remember riding the Bonnie double, original Sunrise and Skye Peak (Killington) so maybe I have too much tolerance for cold slow lifts. (as long as they're moving!)😅

Horrible idea. When NRX is running properly, it’s my favorite lift on the mountain. All vertical, no runout,… a bazillion options- trees, moguls, cruisers.
Yeah I agree when NRX is working, it's great.
In addition to the reasons already cited by newpy and djd, another reason that a replacement with a fixed grip chair would be a bad idea is it would send the message that ME is not important and a 2nd class citizen.
I agree that a lift downgrade would send a message. But is ME not already 2nd class? (ok then I guess it'd be even more 2nd class.) But, fair point.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,741
Points
113
Location
NJ
I agree it'd be quite long but I think Id still rather sit on a FG NR than take those 2 lifts. That and Summit itself is equally chilly.

I'd actually say Summit is not that chilly a lot of the time. It is fairly well protected (especially once you're above Black Diamond) unless you get wind coming straight down the line. NRX on the other hand is unprotected in numerous spots.

I agree that a lift downgrade would send a message. But is ME not already 2nd class? (ok then I guess it'd be even more 2nd class.) But, fair point.

How it is viewed today wasn't my point, more-so it would show you how management views ME long-term. We've heard from time to time "we care about ME, it is important, etc, etc". But taking that action of a down-grade would remove any doubt about how ME is really classified.
 
Top