• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

VAIL SUCKS

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,788
Points
113
Location
NJ
I think the best thing Vail can do help grow the sport is do a better job of advertising Epic Day passes. Isn't Stowe only like $67 a day with an Epic Day Pass?

What is the cost for feeder hill Epic Day Passes? Would it move the needle if it were say $45?

Yes, it is ~$67. But it still requires you to plan in advanced and buy the day pass before they stop selling them. $67 is the lowest price point for the epic day pass (that's a restricted version not valid at all resorts and not valid on holidays). They should have an even lower tier for the feeder hills. $67 to Stowe is not bad at all. $67 to ski an area in the Poconos or southern PA sucks though relatively speaking.
 

jimmywilson69

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
3,432
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg, PA
not sure at this point. I know a buddy pass for my son was $57 1/8. Walk up is stupid, $79 at Roundtop. That price is static.
 

RISkier

Active member
Joined
Dec 3, 2003
Messages
1,062
Points
38
Location
Rhode Island
Sometimes a person I know who is middle aged will say something like, "I've never tried skiing, maybe I'll give it a shot". I've got no good sales pitch for taking up skiing. There's nothing easy, convenient, or cheap about it, and it's incredibly time-consuming. So when people start talking like they'll try it I'm not very encouraging.
Well, it's been a great adventure but initially there are both physical and psychological barriers. I recall that about our 4th or 5th day we were getting ready and the boots went on a lot faster, walking in them became much easier, we'd learned how to carry skis, poles, etc. The views of the lakes from Gunstock or Sunapee are very rewarding. I think we also kind of lucked out. We went to Stowe and at the time they had a vacation rewards program. Buy a 3+ day ticket and you could choose a bonus, one of which was a group lesson. We got a PSIA level III the first day, and the 2nd day, and the 3rd day. At the end of the 3rd day he said he was stopping at Horn and we should join him if we liked. We became friends and ended up doing a couple of Utah trips with him and some other folks from Stowe. We've done 3 ski trips to Austria, several trips to Utah, a couple of trips to CO. It's really made winter something to look forward to rather than dread. At this point I'll never become a great skier, I have some pretty significant back issues that aren't going away. But I comfortably ski stuff I would never have thought I would when we started. My wife is even a certified level I instructor. She is really into skiing. So I'd say it's very rewarding if you get past the initial hump, and I think a single 2 hour lesson just isn't enough for most folks like me when I started. I'd love to see places offering affordable multi-day packages and really try to help folks get past that first day or two.
 

abc

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
5,943
Points
113
Location
Lower Hudson Valley
What percentage of revenue is locals vs flatlanders?
I'm not "local" to a big hill. But I'm "local" to a feeder in the low land. And the Cats are reasonably day-trip-able.

Had I be interested in "trying" skiing, I have options without involving much travel.

I always assumed it was all about weekends and holidays.
It's all about weekends and holidays alright. But that doesn't equate travel.

Where I live is also densely populated. So I see myself a lot more representative of "majority of ski public" than Brooklynites or Long Islanders. ;)
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,608
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
Wall Street analysts recommending Vail straighten out its operating issues before acquiring more resorts. . .

That's a problem. If you stop the M&A you lose the ability to juice earnings with revenue from bolt-on acquisitions simultaneous to synergistic cost cuts. Not to mention, without perma-M&A to cloud the view, analysts would get a clearer & more accurate view of same store & YoY comps. Nah, cant stop wont stop (until you have to stop).
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,608
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
I don't know why the annalists don't mention that Vail is killing off new comers to the sport and future business.

Because Wall Street analysts aren't putting out 10 year business models, they're putting out 1 year price targets.

But I agree with the assessment that Vail/Alterra are killing the future of skiing by decreasing the likelihood of new skiers, and I've believed that since day 1, but I've also thought that this will take a LONG time for people to visualize in the data, because all you're seeing now is massive pass sales, but not generally from beginner skiers.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,608
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
Sometimes a person I know who is middle aged will say something like, "I've never tried skiing, maybe I'll give it a shot". I've got no good sales pitch for taking up skiing. There's nothing easy, convenient, or cheap about it, and it's incredibly time-consuming. So when people start talking like they'll try it I'm not very encouraging.

I'm the exact opposite, I practically grab their arm & drag them to the mountain. I'll bring it up the next time I see them that they mentioned it. I basically turn into a Ski Jehovah.
 
Top