• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

VAIL SUCKS

Kingslug20

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2021
Messages
2,506
Points
113
Did a lot more on epic than Ikon..but both worked out well so far.
Epic is working out to about $20.00 a day.
Ikon about double that..still good though.
 

jaytrem

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
2,156
Points
113
Great season so far! Got some nice snow on our New England Indy trip. Mount Snow did a pretty good job. Could use more snowmaking and less paid parking, but they did run more lifts more often then Peak, and the trees were skiable enough for us most of the time. Also, finally got to ski the mid-west, what could be better than that??? Got a WA/Whistler trip still to come. If I finally make it to Crystal it will be a big win, I'm the Buffalo Bills so far, 0 for 4 with that place...

Too much snow, road is closed.
Too little snow, resort is closed.
Too much rain, road is washed out.
Too much Covid, passholders only.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,201
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
I wonder if it'll count as a 'Vail owned' resort so I can use my cheap pass over there?
Probably. And after reading the article, I am perplexed how $150 mill buys a majority interest in a company whose owner has invested literally billions (with a "b"). I would expect that the value of the company would be higher but if revenues were low.....
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,201
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Yeah I would've thought a 55% stake would've cost a lot more than $150 Million
The $159 mill price, and 55% ownership interest, places the value of the company at $289 million total (149 mill Euros, total value 270.9 mill Euros). Without knowing more information, such as annual revenue and profit margins, it is hard to know if this is a low price really. It depends on how the company was valued. If it is times-revenue, I've seen some industries use a 5x annual revenue figure (but I see it can be as low as 1x or 2x, or lower). Still, $289 mill value seems low for a resort that size (I rode the Glacier Express through Andermatt and it is an impressive ski resort with a lot of newer lifts and spread over a good-sized area). Perhaps the deal is like Stowe--only the ski operations are purchased and the hotels and other businesses are not.
 

machski

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
3,937
Points
113
Location
Northwood, NH (Sunday River, ME)
The $159 mill price, and 55% ownership interest, places the value of the company at $289 million total (149 mill Euros, total value 270.9 mill Euros). Without knowing more information, such as annual revenue and profit margins, it is hard to know if this is a low price really. It depends on how the company was valued. If it is times-revenue, I've seen some industries use a 5x annual revenue figure (but I see it can be as low as 1x or 2x, or lower). Still, $289 mill value seems low for a resort that size (I rode the Glacier Express through Andermatt and it is an impressive ski resort with a lot of newer lifts and spread over a good-sized area). Perhaps the deal is like Stowe--only the ski operations are purchased and the hotels and other businesses are not.
Not what I have read. Unlike many Euro resorts where every piece is owned by different entities, this one sounded more like a NA resort. Everything was in the business package and Vail gets a piece of it all.
 

Zermatt

Active member
Joined
Mar 13, 2016
Messages
689
Points
43
Location
Connecticut
Not what I have read. Unlike many Euro resorts where every piece is owned by different entities, this one sounded more like a NA resort. Everything was in the business package and Vail gets a piece of it all.
Correct. Andermatt is relatively new and much more like a US resort wholly owned by a single entity versus dozens of different interested parties. They likely control the on mountain dining and ski school.
 

doublediamond

Active member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
553
Points
43
Remember that when Vail bought Stowe, they only got the mountain operations. AIG still holds on to the Spruce Peak development, and a lot of land around Tollhouse.

It’s possible Vail only bought 55% of the operations.
 
Top