• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

VAIL SUCKS

gittist

Active member
Joined
Oct 22, 2019
Messages
288
Points
43
Soooo, everyone is looking forward to a wonderful, enjoyable, snowy, uncrowded with excellent snow making at your local well managed Vail Resort next season! :ROFLMAO:. Next year will be great!! And best of all PAID PARKING to reduce the crowding!! wooo hooo!
 

RichT

Active member
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
793
Points
43
Location
N Haledon, NJ/Jewett, NY/South Seaside Park, NJ
Soooo, everyone is looking forward to a wonderful, enjoyable, snowy, uncrowded with excellent snow making at your local well managed Vail Resort next season! :ROFLMAO:. Next year will be great!! And best of all PAID PARKING to reduce the crowding!! wooo hooo!
The southern NY and eastern PA resorts are going to be NUTS this year if gas prices stay or go up further then they are now. Northern Vermont ski areas should be sweet!
 

eatskisleep

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
1,617
Points
83
The southern NY and eastern PA resorts are going to be NUTS this year if gas prices stay or go up further then they are now. Northern Vermont ski areas should be sweet!
North Conway area has been a ghost town lately. Gas prices already hitting hard up there.
 

2Planker

Well-known member
Joined
May 16, 2007
Messages
1,641
Points
113
Location
MWV, NH
North Conway area has been a ghost town lately. Gas prices already hitting hard up there.
So true ! Town was empty this past weekend. No reserv necessary anywhere on a Sat night....

NH Toll Traffic has NOT seen any significant drop in #'s so far......
 

machski

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
3,935
Points
113
Location
Northwood, NH (Sunday River, ME)
North Conway area has been a ghost town lately. Gas prices already hitting hard up there.
We were over camping in Franconia Wed-Sat. It was a ghostown at the campground Wednesday but got busier as the weekend approached. Still not full summer season yet, guessing folks will pull back on longer distance short length trips, still to be seen if longer time length travels will be affected as well.
 

2Planker

Well-known member
Joined
May 16, 2007
Messages
1,641
Points
113
Location
MWV, NH
We were over camping in Franconia Wed-Sat. It was a ghostown at the campground Wednesday but got busier as the weekend approached. Still not full summer season yet, guessing folks will pull back on longer distance short length trips, still to be seen if longer time length travels will be affected as well.
At least there are no more Canadians coming to Pittsburgh (NH) to buy gas
 
Last edited:

jimmywilson69

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
3,411
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg, PA
He is such a self serving piece of shit. Sure they didn't exceed any peak days. But how many days were closer to the peak than there used to be? the average number of people on the hills has been raised, which is exactly what someone who's only worried about making money for shareholders cares about.

How long are there seriously going to play the covid short staffed card...
 

eatskisleep

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
1,617
Points
83
He is such a self serving piece of shit. Sure they didn't exceed any peak days. But how many days were closer to the peak than there used to be? the average number of people on the hills has been raised, which is exactly what someone who's only worried about making money for shareholders cares about.

How long are there seriously going to play the covid short staffed card...
Number of people average has been raised while operating less lifts, less snowmaking, shorter season, less staff. It’s a shit show!
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,764
Points
113
Location
NJ
He is such a self serving piece of shit. Sure they didn't exceed any peak days. But how many days were closer to the peak than there used to be? the average number of people on the hills has been raised, which is exactly what someone who's only worried about making money for shareholders cares about.

How long are there seriously going to play the covid short staffed card...

"None even came close to their historical peak days". There's just so many questions from that response by Katz. What are they using as that actual "peak" basis? Was it some random powder day on a holiday that drew record crowds years ago? Have other skier behavior patterns changed that result in more crowds at a particular time? For example, maybe on a previous peak day years ago you had 1000 people show up (just using this number for simplicity). But maybe 500 of those people showed up in the morning and 500 showed up in the afternoon and you really never had most of those people on the hill at the same time so it didn't feel overly crowded. And maybe now you had 900 people showing up, but maybe the bulk of them all showed up at the same time. From a numbers perspective, sure, that could be "not even close to historical peak", but from a skier experience perspective it would be very different.

And also very valid point you raise about "how many days were closer to the peak than there used to be". In the past people concerned about crowds knew to avoid certain widely well known peak days. If those "close to peak, but not actually peak" days now happen on a regular basis, the perception of those people that used to be able to avoid the worst days now completely changes as they can no longer do that.
 

jimmywilson69

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
3,411
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg, PA
Rob Katz is the cancer of skiing. Thanks for ruining every resort you Douche
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

I fixed it for you because I want the message to be clear!

He's so incredibly full of himself and his "lets make skiing for everyone" mantra. He's right the industry does want to include more people and gather new people to the sport. However, there are better ways to do it besides making it cheap and then nickle and diming people while providing a shitty experience.
 

ss20

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
3,989
Points
113
Location
A minute from the Alta exit off the I-15!
"None even came close to their historical peak days". There's just so many questions from that response by Katz. What are they using as that actual "peak" basis? Was it some random powder day on a holiday that drew record crowds years ago? Have other skier behavior patterns changed that result in more crowds at a particular time? For example, maybe on a previous peak day years ago you had 1000 people show up (just using this number for simplicity). But maybe 500 of those people showed up in the morning and 500 showed up in the afternoon and you really never had most of those people on the hill at the same time so it didn't feel overly crowded. And maybe now you had 900 people showing up, but maybe the bulk of them all showed up at the same time. From a numbers perspective, sure, that could be "not even close to historical peak", but from a skier experience perspective it would be very different.

And also very valid point you raise about "how many days were closer to the peak than there used to be". In the past people concerned about crowds knew to avoid certain widely well known peak days. If those "close to peak, but not actually peak" days now happen on a regular basis, the perception of those people that used to be able to avoid the worst days now completely changes as they can no longer do that.

Very true, lotta ways to interpret his quotes. Lots of resorts, even the destinations ones, don't/can't run literally all their lifts anymore it seems. Especially this season with staffing shortages. While a few old fixed-grip lifts not running may seem like it wouldn't have an impact on lift lines, it's those fixed-grip lifts that act as "people eaters" since the chair spacing is tighter and the ride time is longer. If you have 400 people, you can fit 200 on 50 chairs on a HSQ and the other 200 will be waiting in line. On a fixed grip you can fit all 400 people on the chair with no line as there's twice as many chairs. And when there's staffing shortages it's usually the long fixed-grip lifts that are first to go unused.
 

machski

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
3,935
Points
113
Location
Northwood, NH (Sunday River, ME)
Very true, lotta ways to interpret his quotes. Lots of resorts, even the destinations ones, don't/can't run literally all their lifts anymore it seems. Especially this season with staffing shortages. While a few old fixed-grip lifts not running may seem like it wouldn't have an impact on lift lines, it's those fixed-grip lifts that act as "people eaters" since the chair spacing is tighter and the ride time is longer. If you have 400 people, you can fit 200 on 50 chairs on a HSQ and the other 200 will be waiting in line. On a fixed grip you can fit all 400 people on the chair with no line as there's twice as many chairs. And when there's staffing shortages it's usually the long fixed-grip lifts that are first to go unused.
Ok, this makes almost no sense. Just because a FGC has more chairs, doesn't mean it reduces lines. They also run at least than half the speed of detaches (often FGC are not run at their full operating speeds to make loading easier. So a FGQ will potentially run at 1/4 the speed of new, modern D-Line equipment). The FG slow speeds negate any line eating capacity over detaches given their slow speeds. They usually don't have lines if they are near detaches as folks vastly prefer riding detach chairs.
 

gittist

Active member
Joined
Oct 22, 2019
Messages
288
Points
43
Ok, this makes almost no sense. Just because a FGC has more chairs, doesn't mean it reduces lines. They also run at least than half the speed of detaches (often FGC are not run at their full operating speeds to make loading easier. So a FGQ will potentially run at 1/4 the speed of new, modern D-Line equipment). The FG slow speeds negate any line eating capacity over detaches given their slow speeds. They usually don't have lines if they are near detaches as folks vastly prefer riding detach chairs.
I guess that's why they're putting FGCs in at Jack Frost and other places. I read someplace that Vail was under the impression that people liked 'quads', what I don't think they realized is that we like FAST detachable quads...but then again maybe there's some ulterior motives involved. Like food kiosks along the lift lines to increase the revenue.
 
Top