• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

VAIL SUCKS

Edd

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
6,639
Points
113
Location
Newmarket, NH
I have one big issue with Stowe...SB has 80 runs open now..and before the storm they were almost 100% open...Stowe...30%
So to me it's like going to the buffet..paying full price...and getting 5 dishes to choose from.....and pay to park on weekends.
Really???
Has SB scored significantly more natural than Stowe so far? Those numbers don’t make sense.
 

KustyTheKlown

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
5,476
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn
It’s about stowe/vail being pussies and sugarbush being liberal about letting the skier decide for themselves. and i guess on alterra allowing local ops teams to make those calls

south of 89 did better in the big storm than north of 89. but not THAT much better and i bet Stowe has picked up more lake effect showers. they’re just pussy bitches.
 

SLyardsale

Active member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
242
Points
28
no mention of the eb5 / west lake upgrade by peak from the vail expert. pats peaks sucks too. no one goes there anymore.
 

Kingslug20

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2021
Messages
2,506
Points
113
You can't ski a stowe run if a rock pops out..except mid season.
No idea their reasoning...
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,826
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
I have one big issue with Stowe...SB has 80 runs open now..and before the storm they were almost 100% open...Stowe...30%
So to me it's like going to the buffet..paying full price...and getting 5 dishes to choose from.....and pay to park on weekends.
Really???
Sounds like an EPIC offering to me.
 

ThatGuy

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
1,654
Points
113
Location
Park City
They have no reasoning. You’ll ski one trail wondering why its even open then get to another and wonder why its closed as you duck the ropes.
 

ThatGuy

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
1,654
Points
113
Location
Park City
Maybe no one wants to work ski patrol for them so they can’t open shit. That’s all I can think of.
 

thebigo

Well-known member
Joined
May 15, 2005
Messages
1,953
Points
113
Location
NH seacoast
When you lose a GM in the fall who did nothing over the summer to prepare for the season, the new GM had an impossible task and she did (and continues to do) an admirable job.

There are many valid things for which to blame Vail - many of them discussed over the almost 400 pages of this thread. Crotched's problems last season were not Vail related.

Joshua, do you actually believe that?

What you just described is malice on the part of the former GM.

Malice by local management is almost always the result of toxic leadership.
 

jaytrem

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
2,112
Points
113
Mount Snow patrol has always been pretty good about opening "thin cover" trail. They just put up a warning sign and let you have at it. I really hope that doesn't change.
 

joshua segal

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
1,031
Points
63
Location
Southern NH
Website
skikabbalah.com
Joshua, do you actually believe that?

What you just described is malice on the part of the former GM.

Malice by local management is almost always the result of toxic leadership.
That is true. From the time he was transferred from Mount Snow by Peak, he expressed nothing but contempt for the mountain and did create a toxic work environment for much of the staff. The new GM is the first in over a decade who really likes our mountain and is creating a very cooperative work environment. She is creating a positivity that is reflected in all aspects of mountain ops.
 

eatskisleep

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
1,584
Points
83
0884B5B8-6D3B-4A40-9E5C-2EEC81DAFA6C.pngIt is good to see that Vail is this season doing written snow reports too. Nate W used to do great snow reports for there and Attitash. Not sure who is doing the current but at least there is something! On another note, the storm really wiped out Wildcat huh? It was at 77% open. Now just 12 trails. Gonna be a tough Christmas week up there.
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,188
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
Utter nonsense: Last season Crotched was unable to hire due to the strong economy (under 2% unemployment in NH). This season, with the $20 per hour minimum wage, Crotched is fully staffed, 7-days a week, snowmaking whenever there is the elusive thing called cold weather, 5-days a week of night skiing, Midnight Madness is back, there are extended hours in the cafeteria and the bar, etc.

When you lose a GM in the fall who did nothing over the summer to prepare for the season, the new GM had an impossible task and she did (and continues to do) an admirable job.

There are many valid things for which to blame Vail - many of them discussed over the almost 400 pages of this thread. Crotched's problems last season were not Vail related.

I'm happy you are fully staffed this year. Your excuses for last year are a copout and erroneous. 2020-21 I could accept your analysis. Not last year. Pat's had no problem staffing (or at least it wasn't a noticeable problem) and didn't reduce hours. They draw from the same general population as Crotched for workers Plenty of other places also did far better with staffing last season. Gunstock ran well, Cannon, Ragged, Loon.

And looking at the snowmaking efforts of the four NH Vail properties this season, the efforts are still substandard to prior ownership. Maybe it's no longer staffing and just an austerity budget. It's been a tough year for weather, but others are doing far better. Sunapee should be right there with Loon in terms of open terrain and typically was under the Mueller's.

I don't see anything compelling to win my business back. I think I know what I'm looking at from afar too, having been a pass holder at those mountains 2012 through 2020, with 2015 being the loan exception.
 

Kingslug20

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2021
Messages
2,506
Points
113
Still amazed that Stowe has let almost all of the diamond and double d's remain closed.
Only 1 trail off the gondola...
They are finaly blowing nosedive..but it's almost January.
I know they lost power but that's solved.
Not spending much time there lately....
 

eatskisleep

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
1,584
Points
83
Still amazed that Stowe has let almost all of the diamond and double d's remain closed.
Only 1 trail off the gondola...
They are finaly blowing nosedive..but it's almost January.
I know they lost power but that's solved.
Not spending much time there lately....
I still stand by my comment in the other thread that Stowe is overrated. Sad what it has become.
 

doublediamond

Active member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
519
Points
43
One thing to note about snowmaking at Vail areas is that for the most part they make snow deep and resurface only when necessary. They don’t hop back to the same trail many times. Eearly season it’s very slow to open terrain but that snow depth is deep.

Last year I was at Sunapee early season and they had 4-5 foot depths on the terrain that was open, but only 3 ways down from the top INCLUDING nothing open on the bunny area despite being open for weeks. They could be easily had double the terrain open (and this is still excluding the pillaging on the Sunapee snowmaking team to boost the Okemo snowmaking team they did last year).

It’s an approach that works out west but it doesn’t work in the east. They refuse to adapt.
 

SLyardsale

Active member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
242
Points
28
I'm happy you are fully staffed this year. Your excuses for last year are a copout and erroneous. 2020-21 I could accept your analysis. Not last year. Pat's had no problem staffing (or at least it wasn't a noticeable problem) and didn't reduce hours. They draw from the same general population as Crotched for workers Plenty of other places also did far better with staffing last season. Gunstock ran well, Cannon, Ragged, Loon.

And looking at the snowmaking efforts of the four NH Vail properties this season, the efforts are still substandard to prior ownership. Maybe it's no longer staffing and just an austerity budget. It's been a tough year for weather, but others are doing far better. Sunapee should be right there with Loon in terms of open terrain and typically was under the Mueller's.

I don't see anything compelling to win my business back. I think I know what I'm looking at from afar too, having been a pass holder at those mountains 2012 through 2020, with 2015 being the loan exception.
If there is an interest, you can read along with Crotched insiders on last year's struggles / excuses for Crotched over at the Vail Corp ski chat: Crotched 21-22

And, I continue to find this interesting as currently more posts ring up here on AZ than on SJ

cm 21 22.JPG
 

Attachments

  • cm 21.JPG
    cm 21.JPG
    54.4 KB · Views: 10

oldfartrider

Active member
Joined
Dec 9, 2021
Messages
193
Points
28
Location
Nashua
Early season Stowe this year was way better than the bush. The bush had the same terrain open for weeks which was one trail off the valley chair and those few boring runs at gatehouse. The quality of the snow was also much better at Stowe than the bush.
 

drjeff

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
19,326
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn, CT
One thing to note about snowmaking at Vail areas is that for the most part they make snow deep and resurface only when necessary. They don’t hop back to the same trail many times. Eearly season it’s very slow to open terrain but that snow depth is deep.

Last year I was at Sunapee early season and they had 4-5 foot depths on the terrain that was open, but only 3 ways down from the top INCLUDING nothing open on the bunny area despite being open for weeks. They could be easily had double the terrain open (and this is still excluding the pillaging on the Sunapee snowmaking team to boost the Okemo snowmaking team they did last year).

It’s an approach that works out west but it doesn’t work in the east. They refuse to adapt.

One could argue that Killington, and other non Vail ski areas as well, have started to adopt this strategy too, especially since it seems that more rain events as the season ramps up, is becoming a regular thing, and ski areas seem to be adapting to this by putting down deeper bases on snowmaking terrain as they roll those trails out to try and prevent a melt out that would cause them to have to go back to square 1 and completely recover a trail, almost from scratch, after a rain event(s).

Some ski areas just simply have more snowmaking firepower than others, and this shift in season starting strategies, combined with not so much natural snow help that sticks around for a while courtesy of mother nature, exposes this. I mean has anyone ever really condsidered places like Sugarbush, Stowe and Jay top tier with their snowmaking firepower? And arguably one can say that while Killington has a TON of sheer size firepower they also have to deal with the fact that their system is as efficient as other resorts,, almost to the point where it's not far fetched to say that while their system is in the say top 3 or 5 in the East, it's not the #1 system in the East anymore when it comes to how quickly and efficiently they can cover multiple trails with enough snow to comfortably let them move onto new terrain to work on opening up

The reality is if you look at trail counts and acreage open right now (as it seems like another warm up and liquid event 😡😡 is just a few days away) the ski areas, both large and small from South to North, known for their snowmaking firepower, in general seem to be doing OK trail count wise, whereas the ski areas who often rely more on natural snow, tend to be struggling more, across most of New England ski country, right now
 
Last edited:
Top