BenedictGomez
Well-known member
Mixed bag is my take:
1) The $2 raise was a given. Just via inflation alone it should have gone up $1.50ish. Vail couldn't care less.
2) The wage parity I think is written to make you think they got the perma inflationary increase they wanted, but I dont think they did; it sounds like they just get whatever some other Vail property's patrol can hold Vail hostage for assuming & only if it's higher than PCMR.
3) The "average" going up $4 means most PCMR patrollers will now make > $29 hour from $> $25, so that's a win.
4) It doesnt say what "most tenured" means, but I presume that means the dynamite chuckers will make > $40 now?
5) Sounds like they didnt get the turbo expensive healthcare asks they wanted, which was supposedly one of the most important demands
6) Gained access to parental leave is a win. How much so we dont know. Could they really have got 3 months paid on a 4 months gig? I'm skeptical.
1) The $2 raise was a given. Just via inflation alone it should have gone up $1.50ish. Vail couldn't care less.
2) The wage parity I think is written to make you think they got the perma inflationary increase they wanted, but I dont think they did; it sounds like they just get whatever some other Vail property's patrol can hold Vail hostage for assuming & only if it's higher than PCMR.
3) The "average" going up $4 means most PCMR patrollers will now make > $29 hour from $> $25, so that's a win.
4) It doesnt say what "most tenured" means, but I presume that means the dynamite chuckers will make > $40 now?
5) Sounds like they didnt get the turbo expensive healthcare asks they wanted, which was supposedly one of the most important demands
6) Gained access to parental leave is a win. How much so we dont know. Could they really have got 3 months paid on a 4 months gig? I'm skeptical.