mount snow if they get the water project approved and somehow miraculously buy and connect to Haystack
Isn't Haystack now private?
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
mount snow if they get the water project approved and somehow miraculously buy and connect to Haystack
Isn't Haystack now private?
I'd second Jay and also mention Whiteface, with the Lookout Mountain expansion. I also believe there were talks about expanding Whiteface to another peak as well, though I don't know what's happening with that, and Lookout will already put them at their max trail mileage.
Whiteface was certainly in my honorable mention thoughts. Their trail expansion is pretty impressive in it's on right, but I was of the understanding that...bedeep, bedeep, bedeep...that's all folks..
What about Gore? Do they have as strict of limitations on their expansion as Whiteface?
By that's all do you mean no more trail expansions or no slopeside lodging or village to go with it? If you mean the latter, you are probably totally right. I was focusing more on the skiing experience. As far as more trails, I'd like to hear someone knowledgeable chime in on the other mountain that I remember hearing something about, and whether that is at all possible, especially given the mileage limit.
Not sure about Gore. I haven't heard about one recently at least, so maybe they just aren't as close to it? HPD probably would know. Gore's expansion is impressive too, but it seems like it's adding vertical going down more than going up, and the terrain doesn't give me the impression as being quite as interesting--I could be completely 100% wrong here though.
Lookout is the other peak.
There was another peak aside from Lookout that had been discussed, at least among skiers if not the mountain. I realize Lookout is already a separate peak from the already-developed ones.
I'm not trying to give you a hard time, but besides Little WF, WF and Lookout what other peak is there to expand to that would make sense?
Well then I was wrong, I guessI just thought I remembered something about their being 2 peaks to looker's right of the Slides. I could be (and seemingly am) mistaken. I haven't been to Whiteface in a while, so my memory of the mountains surrounding where there are currently trails isn't oo good.
stowe cleintel will deffinatly change in the next 10 years but there is nothing that is going to change at mansfield. they can't add anything. the best terrain is not visible from the lifts so people have no idea how to get there. you will never see an expanision into the notch. it is what it is and that one of the things that i love about it.Stowe will by far and away eclipsed Stratton as the "glitzy" resort in the East.
The thread is about which resort will be the most improved, not see the most growthIn VT, I think Okemo/Sugarbush/Stowe all may see significant growth
Ok, so what I was thinking of is what was referred to as the "Tree Island Pod". Perhaps it is not on a new peak, and I just made that assumption.
Edit: So Tree Island Pod appears to be on Whiteface Mountain. [http://www.vinsweb.org/assets/pdf/ORDA2004.pdf]
That was the orginal name for the Lookout mt. expansion. I can see how you got confused.
Lookout is the other peak.
I read somewhere that Gore's limit is 40 miles.
I agree with you, even diehard Gore fans have said as much on SKIADK. That said, to answer the original question I think Gore will be the most changed place in 10 years. The trail expansion will go down to the Ski Bowl where there is a ton of new development planned. Residents will have a lift they can walk to, which is unique to the ADK Park. They are also planning an 18 hole golf course and a train hookup from Saratoge. People in the NYC area will be able to get train service right to Gore.
ORDA actually took money out of the Lookout project and put in into Gore's expansion. I've heard that money has been found to take it's place, but to my mind it shows ORDA's deep commentment to making Gore's expansion work. Gore will be a very different place, no longer a day trip, with a hard core local base. It will be a destination resort in the Northeast. If I was a Gore regular I'm not sure if I would like that or not.
Certainly good points, though Saddleback is essentially at the same disadvantage geographically as Sugarloaf. I guess my feelings are that with the lakes right there for summer use, the unlimited snowmaking potential and plans already approved, a lot will happen there. In my opinion, Saddleback has more year round appeal than SR and SL. I don't expect it to ever garner the skier visits of SR, but I do think they have the potential to get in the same range as SL.
The figure on p. 12 of this pdf (http://www.vinsweb.org/assets/pdf/ORDA2004.pdf) seems to indicate that they are different -- the Tree Island Pod is somewhere in the vicinity of the Slides on Whiteface Mountain and the Lookout Pod is on Lookout Mountain.. Am I looking at this wrong? Sorry for any confusion.
I would think that Smuggs would put in some new lifts as time goes on... really surprised they haven't yet.
When you look at the trail map http://www.whiteface.com/newsite/onmtn/zoommap/zoommap.htm
to the right it says proposed terrain, with 4 trails, 1 lift and 60 acres of glades. 2 trails have been cut, the long intermediate and the expert one that runs next to the lift line. The plan for this off season is to install the triple chair, put in snow making for the 2 cut trails and open them, along with the 60 acres of new glades, this comming season. The other 2 trails are slated for the following season.
The orginal name for this project was the Tree Island Pod which is on Lookout Mt. Now they just call it Lookout Mt.