• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

3 most personally overrated ski areas you have skied.

skiMEbike

New member
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
346
Points
0
Location
Maine
Very true. I went there this year with extremely low expectations, and I was still disappointed.

I think the most frustrating part is that it could be a real great area. Much like the discussion about Stowe having a thriving ski culture underneath the glitz and $$, with Loon could be the same with Lincoln. There are lots of small things they could do on the mountain that would improve the experience for advanced/expert skiers without ruining the cash cow that they have now.

Oh well, maybe it's just as well with Cannon right up the road.

Same here. Agree Lincoln has the potential for being a great ski town...the only problem it's lacking a real mountain (sans Cannon). I had an interesting run in/conversation with ski patrol (I'll save the details for my trip report)....It's one thing to not have the topography to offer up any interesting/challenging terrain, but to have an attitude or philosophy that supports that mantra is kind of ridiculous.
 

Domeskier

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 15, 2012
Messages
2,278
Points
63
Location
New York
I'm not sure where you're trying to go with this. I do know some trust fund ski bums in town for sure. I also know plenty of cooks, nurses, school teachers, real estate sales people, tradesmen etc. that moved there after college and still live in town. I know waiters in their 40s and 50s with Masters degrees. Look up the college education rates in town if you're so inclined. Often they live in Morrisville or Waterbury as the real estate in town is out of reach, however the draw is Mount Mansfield.

I guess I don't consider contributing members of society to be ski bums. When I think of ski bums, I think of jobless ski-bros living off the largess of their indifferent Bogner-wearing parents. I'd rather not hang out with either group. But then again, I might belong at MRG based on VTK's assessment....
 

abc

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
5,936
Points
113
Location
Lower Hudson Valley
Actually, Stowe is no doubt the Aspen of the east. Terrain, snow, infrastructure. What more does anyone want? To have that in the cheap and NOT seeing any rich folks that pay the bills, right? Yeah...

The college educated ski bums knows enough to pamper the rich which in turn support their own snow addiction. If you have trouble understand that, sorry, it just shows you're not too smart.

But you can always try a more blue collared place like...Waterville! ;)
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,338
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
I guess I don't consider contributing members of society to be ski bums. When I think of ski bums, I think of jobless ski-bros living off the largess of their indifferent Bogner-wearing parents. I'd rather not hang out with either group. But then again, I might belong at MRG based on VTK's assessment....

Most of the aforementioned started in town that way. Crappy seasonal job, a ski pass and a couch to crash on. The pros figured out how to stay and eek out a decent quality of life.
 

Scruffy

Active member
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
1,157
Points
38
Location
In the shadow of the moon.
People are entitled to their opinion, it's just hard to overrate Mount Mansfield. Best combination of terrain and snow in New England. Off map opportunities are so vast and easy to get to. Really bummed I missed out on skiing there this season.

You hit at the heart of the matter with a thread like this; judging a mountain's rating is all about the perception of the the skier/rider.
If you're a groomer queen, you'll have a perception that a mountain is over/underrated that is vastly different than someone who can actually ski every line, in and out of bounds, on any given day, with aplomb.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
Blah blah blah

Identifying a ski area as compatible with a particular handicap is idiotic. By extrapolation you are an idiot.
Aren't you the person who said, "You'd be happy at a place that caters to retards."

I don't mind vigorous debate, but when you insist on keeping it in the gutter you aren't exactly dissuading me of my opinion of MRG.
 

hammer

Active member
Joined
Apr 28, 2004
Messages
5,493
Points
38
Location
flatlands of Mass.
Seems like Sunday River gets a lot of knocks on this thread, guess I'll have to tell you if I agree after going there later this week...

Not sure if I would call any area I've been to overrated. I've been to places where I don't care if I go back again, but in most cases each of those ski areas seemed to cater to their expected customers.
 

boston_e

Active member
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
714
Points
43
Seems like Sunday River gets a lot of knocks on this thread, guess I'll have to tell you if I agree after going there later this week...

Not sure if I would call any area I've been to overrated. I've been to places where I don't care if I go back again, but in most cases each of those ski areas seemed to cater to their expected customers.

Sunday River, like Killington can be hard to navigate. I've had some great days there. I can see how people would think of each as overrated if they have only been there a couple or few times (especially without a good guide).
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
I included Sunday River not because it is a bad ski area - but because it is way overhyped. I am sure that you will have a fine time there.
 

MMP

New member
Joined
Oct 7, 2010
Messages
295
Points
0
Aren't you the person who said, "You'd be happy at a place that caters to retards."

I don't mind vigorous debate, but when you insist on keeping it in the gutter you aren't exactly dissuading me of my opinion of MRG.


since you aren't too smart; I was using an absurdity to highlight your absurdity. And since reading comprehension isn't a core competency of yours, I never said anything about MRG. But that you don't like it does speak volumes.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
since you aren't too smart; I was using an absurdity to highlight your absurdity. And since reading comprehension isn't a core competency of yours, I never said anything about MRG. But that you don't like it does speak volumes.

With just a handful in f posts you sure know how to make an impression.

Peace.


.
 

hammer

Active member
Joined
Apr 28, 2004
Messages
5,493
Points
38
Location
flatlands of Mass.
I included Sunday River not because it is a bad ski area - but because it is way overhyped. I am sure that you will have a fine time there.
Understand. Guess I wonder what is overhyped about it...guess from what I've read/heard it's a more intermediate-friendly version of Killington (which I enjoyed on my one trip there despite crowds and less than ideal weather and conditions).

It is interesting to read others' opinions...for example, if I were to just base my opinions of Deer Valley on what I've read here I'd actually call it underrated, but I'm not an advanced skier so what I like about a ski area doesn't mesh with many others here.
 

Grizzly Adams

New member
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
37
Points
0
Location
Boston, MA
Sunday River - boasting about 7 peaks sounds awesome until you realize it takes a load of traverse runs and almost every lift to get from one side of the resort to the other. I never had extremely high expectations but always thought of SR as a more challenging place than what I actually discovered, yeah White Heat is steep but it lasts all of 10 seconds.. overall too crowded, too difficult to navigate and not enough vertical drop.

I'd also like to briefly defend Jay, I've been up there a bunch of times and never had a bad experience. There's pretty good trail selection, excellent glades and they normally get plentiful amounts of decent quality snow. I've only been on weekends but its never been overly crowded. I also think the headwall chutes and out-of-bounds/side-country areas Jay has are neat features because most places on the east coast don't offer these types of terrain.
 

Cannonball

New member
Joined
Oct 18, 2007
Messages
3,669
Points
0
Location
This user has been deleted
2. Killington VT
The place is huge for East coast standards. Whenever I ski there I feel I spend the entire day trying to get somewhere, not actually enjoying the place. I am sure with a local it could be great, but as a visitor I have never been able to figure out them place.

Sunday River: very fun mountain but the place sucks to navigate.

1. Another vote for Killington. Bigger does not mean better. Seems like you spend more time on runs that connect a bunch of mid sized ski areas.

Sunday River, like Killington can be hard to navigate.

Sunday River - boasting about 7 peaks sounds awesome until you realize it takes a load of traverse runs and almost every lift to get from one side of the resort to the other.

Pretty common theme running here: big (wide) resorts are hard to navigate and require a lot of traversing. That will certainly be your impression if you try to ski the whole mountain in a day. Tip: don't do that. Just because there are a lot of peaks doesn't mean to have to ski a lot of peaks. Look at the map, identify some terrain that looks interesting to you, and stick with it all day.

I can't think of a resort I've been to that felt overrated.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,582
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
Bland is not a word used to describe Stowe. Save that for Okemo.

Yeah, I have zero problems with folks criticizing Stowe or having various XYZ opinions on mountains, but the logic was completely bizarre.

Saying Killington has great terrain but Stowe's is bland, and that he prefers Bolton to Stowe is not an "opinion", it's an uninformed state. There might be 100 reasons to perhaps hate the Lamborghini Gallardo, but saying it's "too slow" is certainly not one of them.
 
Last edited:

Grizzly Adams

New member
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
37
Points
0
Location
Boston, MA
I have my qualms with Stowe, but it is a true skier's mountain. If you think it's bland you either haven't really explored it, or don't have the skill and/or balls to hit the expert stuff which is, IMO, some of the best in New England.

^this.
 

Abominable

Active member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
491
Points
28
Pretty common theme running here: big (wide) resorts are hard to navigate and require a lot of traversing. That will certainly be your impression if you try to ski the whole mountain in a day. Tip: don't do that. Just because there are a lot of peaks doesn't mean to have to ski a lot of peaks. Look at the map, identify some terrain that looks interesting to you, and stick with it all day.

I went to SR once a couple years ago, for a couple days. First day we tried to 'explore' - ski the whole mountain. Tremendous waste of time and too much traversing. For the rest of the trip we skied pods. Morning at Jordan Bowl, skied our tails off that and Oz, back to truck and drive down to Whitecap lodge for beers in the sun and steep groomers. So I can see how it might be overrated if you think all that acreage translates into vertical. But still a fun place with lots of variety.
 
Top