Eh, I'm going to disagree with the prevailing sentiment on this board: a government body donating to a political campaign for an elected official is very inappropriate. To my fellow liberals: remember how upset we all were when Trump blatantly violated the Hatch Act during the 2020 Republican convention? Remember the justified outrage at Secretary Pompeo used public funds to travel to Israel for a campaign speech?
That being said, based on what we've seen from Sylvia and Ness, it appears very likely that there is more to the story. I won't be the least bit surprised if a valid explanation surfaces.
It looks like Day himself made a statement about this confirming it was a donation:
In a statement to News9, Day disputed the contribution came from public money.
"We are a for-profit entity that has a donation line item in our budget and we donate to different things to promote Gunstock and promote the area and promote skiing in general," he said. "We generate our own revenue and this donation does not affect Belknap County residents because we don't take Belknap County money."
Day said last year, the resort paid the county hundreds of thousands of dollars, about 1% of its gross revenue.
I do think the fact that they're a for profit entity that does not receive taxpayer money makes them a bit different than a typical government body/committee where I can agree you'd consider it inappropriate. Personally I hate the whole concept of political donations in general from anyone and wish they were somehow all made illegal across the board. But since it is legal and I'm assuming this is something other for profit ski areas do as well from time to time, I don't really think this is a big deal like Sylvia claims it is.