Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
That's not the problem the OP (and others on this thread) has. He only wonders where his next goal should be.people believing they have attained their ultimate performance stop being interested in trying new things.
Yes, there is.because there is nothing wrong with either approach,
That's not the problem the OP (and others on this thread) has. He only wonders where his next goal should be.
Yes, there is.
"Lesson is a waste of money", say the self-taughter.
"Lesson is the fastest way to improve", say the lesson taker.
They're both right, FOR THEIR OWN SITUATION!
Those who have a lot of days tend to be favoring self-taught. After all, lessons cost money. If you're busy skiing, you're probably not too busy making money. So "ski more, you'll improve" is the only way they see it. Lesson is a waste of money they don't have.
Those who don't get to ski as much as they like to, tend NOT want to waste time (vacation) and money (lift ticket/gas/lodging cost) figuring out by trial and error the most efficient movement. They'd be more incline to pay for lessons to get them to the right technique/movement/tactics. So they can actually enjoy the skiing trees, bumps or ice rather than being frustrated by them.
The "right" strategy will be the wrong one for a different situation