• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Hybrid quandry

Glenn

Active member
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
7,691
Points
38
Location
CT & VT
I fear there's a smug cloud cover forming over the entire U.S. as we speak, strongest in San Francisco and VT. Let's just hope George Clooney doesn't win any more Oscars. Or Al Gore, for that matter.

VT is interesting. 6 houses or so down from me is a guy with a Z-28, with a loud aftermarket exhaust and about 4 old pickups in various state of repair around his property. 3 houses up, a left leaning lesbian couple complete with the Subuaru and rainbow stickers. But there certainly is a lot of smug in our local area.
 

Glenn

Active member
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
7,691
Points
38
Location
CT & VT
You forgot to tell us if they are lipstick lesbians or not.

We've yet to meet them. But based on the short hair and lack of makeup, I'd say more of the flannel and work boots type.
 

noski

New member
Joined
Jun 24, 2005
Messages
863
Points
0
Location
mad river valley
No ski...
Depends on what anyone means when they say "rough terrain"!;-) If you don't work outside of society's grooming of the roads the only reason for a SUV is for cargo...imho.
Can you work on your pickup!...and tweak it...to keep it healthy to do the rougher terrain stuff for you?

Completely agree about the noise factor from the higher driver's seat!;-)..I have an older 92' Accord...the low sitting things, makes it seem like I'm traveling F1-style...actually a fun ride on occasion...except for when you get into traffic;-).
*Problem is...many cars could do a lot more work, but their body-design and city-style of tires can sometimes make it a little dicey...ie rough on the hardware.. As others have attested to...a small car, with proper tires and weight dist. and "enough" clearance can do a lot..

Our pickup is for Mr. noski- it's still fairly new, and he could take me to work/pick me up on the bad days. My 06 Escape is a lease that is up. My 'rough terrain' drive is one of Fayston throughway's- Center Fayston Rd/Kew Vasseur Rd, for those who know MRV, but it's a gravel road that goes from Rt 100's 800' elevation to 1750' in under 3 miles, so a steady grade, with some sections much steeper than others. Kids are grown (one gone one has his own wheels), so no need to lug much around.

There are many times I am grateful for my gravel road and feel bad for those who have to travel the Interstate....
 

ckofer

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
2,635
Points
0
Location
Strafford, New Hampshire
Website
www.skicheapordie.com
Question about hybrids: I feel that they are a better city vehicle for environmental reasons but want to know something. If you were stuck downtown Boston, NYC, Hartford etc on a hot summer day and running AC, would you need the gas engine soon to run that system? I could google this but thought I would go right to the experts.
 

Edd

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
6,737
Points
113
Location
Newmarket, NH
The hybrid thing is on my brain lately too. My 02 Legacy has 145,000 on it. It's very reliable but all cars start to die so I'm looking at options while it still runs well.

My first impulse is to get an Outback or Forester, probably a 2009 since the 2010s are right around the corner and good deals on 09s should be out there.

However, if truly widespread hybrid technology is around the corner, how much would a conventional gas car, purchased today, be worth in 4-5 years? I don't have a crystal ball but I'm wondering if a Prius with snow tires makes more sense.
 

noski

New member
Joined
Jun 24, 2005
Messages
863
Points
0
Location
mad river valley
I don't have a crystal ball but I'm wondering if a Prius with snow tires makes more sense.

I would vote against that. One of my MRV neighbors (an exec at Seventh Generation- so green is his middle name) is very sorry he got a prius. He hates it in winter. He said on one trip down our gravel hill he started sliding (a normal experience) and the car all but shut down- the normal steer into the skid/punch gas etc. didn't work. My in-laws have a Prius and after a good soaking rain, couldn't make it up our driveway- in May! I don't think the Prius has enough pep-and-heft for our type of winter driving. Maybe in the city.....
 

mondeo

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,431
Points
0
Location
E. Hartford, CT
Question about hybrids: I feel that they are a better city vehicle for environmental reasons but want to know something. If you were stuck downtown Boston, NYC, Hartford etc on a hot summer day and running AC, would you need the gas engine soon to run that system? I could google this but thought I would go right to the experts.
Eventually, yes. The battery is kept between 30% and 80% charged. Once you hit the 30%, you're on the engine. As much as I enjoy doing some simple calculations with values that I can guess at pretty readily (like the acceleration vs cruising energy one,) I'd go to Google myself to figure out how long in practice.
 

mondeo

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,431
Points
0
Location
E. Hartford, CT
However, if truly widespread hybrid technology is around the corner, how much would a conventional gas car, purchased today, be worth in 4-5 years? I don't have a crystal ball but I'm wondering if a Prius with snow tires makes more sense.
Before or after the battery pack is replaced? All other maintenance costs are probably relatively equal, and when it comes down to it there really isn't that big a difference in mileage.
 

Edd

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
6,737
Points
113
Location
Newmarket, NH
Before or after the battery pack is replaced? All other maintenance costs are probably relatively equal, and when it comes down to it there really isn't that big a difference in mileage.

Well....a Prius is rated for 48mpg while a 2009 Outback (around the same size) is rated for 26mpg highway. I'm calling that a big difference.
 

Edd

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
6,737
Points
113
Location
Newmarket, NH
I would vote against that. One of my MRV neighbors (an exec at Seventh Generation- so green is his middle name) is very sorry he got a prius. He hates it in winter. He said on one trip down our gravel hill he started sliding (a normal experience) and the car all but shut down- the normal steer into the skid/punch gas etc. didn't work. My in-laws have a Prius and after a good soaking rain, couldn't make it up our driveway- in May! I don't think the Prius has enough pep-and-heft for our type of winter driving. Maybe in the city.....

That story rings true to me, unfortunately. I test drove a Prius 2 years ago, and the driving experience fell below my low expectations.

Did your neighbor have snow tires on that Prius?
 

RootDKJ

New member
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
7,866
Points
0
Location
Summit
Website
phresheez.com
Question about hybrids: I feel that they are a better city vehicle for environmental reasons but want to know something. If you were stuck downtown Boston, NYC, Hartford etc on a hot summer day and running AC, would you need the gas engine soon to run that system? I could google this but thought I would go right to the experts.
At least in the two Ford Escape's I've driven, yes. The AC compressor is dependent on the gas engine to run. The circulation system is not.
 

Edd

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
6,737
Points
113
Location
Newmarket, NH
Yep, all those AWD Prii out there...

Exactly, hence my remark about snow tires. I've got zero experience with them but if you believe folks like Rivercoil, they beat AWD. Assuming that's true, those mileage stats take on a greater significance.

It seems clear some hybrid models are more effective than others. The difference between the standard Honda Civic and the hybrid is shown here: http://www.cars.com/go/compare/modelCompare.jsp?myids=10584,10590
 

riverc0il

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2001
Messages
13,039
Points
0
Location
Ashland, NH
Website
www.thesnowway.com
Exactly, hence my remark about snow tires. I've got zero experience with them but if you believe folks like Rivercoil, they beat AWD. Assuming that's true, those mileage stats take on a greater significance.

It seems clear some hybrid models are more effective than others. The difference between the standard Honda Civic and the hybrid is shown here: http://www.cars.com/go/compare/modelCompare.jsp?myids=10584,10590
I get a little flip in my remarks about snow tires versus AWD. For me, I will always have snow tires on my car in the winter, AWD or not. That said, I would indeed take snows without AWD rather than AWD without snows.

Any ways, you could save yourself $10k+ and simply get a cheap economy car that gets 35-40 MPG highway and that has less repair costs. True, you'll make up some money with a Prius but you'll never make even close to enough money back to make it worth the hassle.
 

ComeBackMudPuddles

New member
Joined
May 21, 2007
Messages
1,756
Points
0
the new fusion is supposed to be really great. if you don't "need" the utility of the escape, then go with the fusion. a nice ride.

regarding the idea of hybrids, they may not always pay back the owner quickly in terms of monetary savings (especially at low-ish gas prices), but, there's no disputing that they use less gas and pollute less, so that's a good thing. also, i think you'll tend to see gas prices go up rather than down. once the ecoonomy gets going again, the price of oil will surely go up and the hybrid car calculation will look better.
 

mondeo

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,431
Points
0
Location
E. Hartford, CT
...but, there's no disputing that they use less gas and pollute less, so that's a good thing.
But that is the dispute. There is a definate increase in the amount of energy it takes to make a hybrid; some analyses come out in favor of a Hummer over a Prius when you look at life cycle energy consumption. I don't necessarily believe them 100%, but there's a definate up front pollution cost associated with hybrids, and again with battery disposal.
 

ComeBackMudPuddles

New member
Joined
May 21, 2007
Messages
1,756
Points
0
But that is the dispute. There is a definate increase in the amount of energy it takes to make a hybrid; some analyses come out in favor of a Hummer over a Prius when you look at life cycle energy consumption. I don't necessarily believe them 100%, but there's a definate up front pollution cost associated with hybrids, and again with battery disposal.



do you have links to a study like that? i'm not saying it's not true, but hybrids do make use of much smaller engines, which should take a corresponding less amount of energy to produce.

regarding the "total energy consumed" point, it might take more units of energy to make a hybrid car, but the type of energy is important. you can make an argument that even if it takes more total energy to construct and run the hybrid than a conventional car, the fact that the hybrid uses less oil to run (and more of, say, coal?) to construct, is better from a pollution standpoint (don't know if that's true) and energy independence standpoint (that should be true).
 

Glenn

Active member
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
7,691
Points
38
Location
CT & VT
do you have links to a study like that? i'm not saying it's not true, but hybrids do make use of much smaller engines, which should take a corresponding less amount of energy to produce.

regarding the "total energy consumed" point, it might take more units of energy to make a hybrid car, but the type of energy is important. you can make an argument that even if it takes more total energy to construct and run the hybrid than a conventional car, the fact that the hybrid uses less oil to run (and more of, say, coal?) to construct, is better from a pollution standpoint (don't know if that's true) and energy independence standpoint (that should be true).


That fact that you're making a smaller engine is true...but that car has two drive systems...a gasoline engine and an electric motor. When you're done slapping that thing together, I'm sure it takes just as much, if no more resources than your standard car. Oh, and let's not forget the number of batteries in that thing either.

If you're current car is on it's last legs and you plan on keeping your potential new hybrid for 10 to 15 years...then it makes sense...sorta.

If your current car is fine and you're getting a hybrid to...well, to get a hybrid, than that's somewhat of a waste. I personally can't justify myself getting rid of a perfectly good working vehicle; but that's just me.

If you look at that link that posted...showing the difference between the gasoline Civic in and the Hybrid.

The gasoline car will average (equal mix of city and highway calculated for ease of math) 28mpg. The hybrid will get 42.5 MPG. "Holly Steezeasaurus! Hybrid! Get it!"

at 12k miles per year: Gasoline- 428.5 gallons, Hybrid 282 gallons.

Cost at $2.50: $1,071.25 gasoline, $705 Difference: $366.25. So that's you're gas savings.

Lets say you went for the most fuel efficient gasoline Civic, which I'm going to assume is the base model...with the least amount of options and probably a manual. $15,305 the hybrid costs: $23,650 Difference: $8,345. It'll take you 22 years to break even.

"But what if gas goes up!"

$5 a gallon:
Gasoline: $2,142.5
Hybrid: $1,410

Difference: $732. Payout...10+ years.

I'm convinced people never calculate things out like this. Even when gas went crazy last summer, people were Henny Pennying around, ditching perfectly good larger vehicles for smaller ones. This was further exasperated by our very reliable friends: Supply and Demand. Demand for small cars went up, big cars went down. So people took a huge hit on trading in large vehicles and paid more for smaller. Buying high, selling low.
 
Top