• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

LiftBlog Reports that Smuggs and Stowe are Exploring an Interconnect Gondola

BodeMiller1

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 7, 2022
Messages
1,833
Points
63
Location
Barre, VT
Below is a list of resorts from the Whistler - Blackcomb site. The site used to have a map comparing the skiable acreage to other North American resorts. It's not there any longer. This holding company has control over way too much land. Even though all of the holdings are not in the United States it seems like they have a oligopoly (which is okay until "they" have too much pricing power). Everyone in the world is saying Google needs to shed YouTube (I don't care one way or the other). Butt, I do care about this.

This is a clear violation of The Sherman Antitrust Act.


OUR RESORTS
 

ss20

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
3,938
Points
113
Location
A minute from the Alta exit off the I-15!

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,247
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
The kid died. :(

 

djd66

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2015
Messages
909
Points
93
Awful news. Makes me want to hug and kiss my kids as I can’t imagine going through that as a parent.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,545
Points
113
Location
NJ

"Smugglers’ Notch Resort, the last independently owned ski resort in Vermont, is fighting for its life, and they say a proposed gondola connecting Smuggs and Stowe is their lifeline."

Eh?
 

2planks2coasts

Active member
Joined
Aug 1, 2017
Messages
350
Points
43
"Smugglers’ Notch Resort, the last independently owned ski resort in Vermont, is fighting for its life, and they say a proposed gondola connecting Smuggs and Stowe is their lifeline."

Eh?
Yeah. That's gotta be news to Bolton, S6, Burke and Magic
 

raisingarizona

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 19, 2014
Messages
1,083
Points
83
One could argue that it’s the last independent ski “resort” and the others are more appropriately categorized as ski areas but whatever, the media gets things wrong or slightly off in just about every article out there.

The enviro nuts are going to resist for sure but in reality it would likely have beneficial impacts on automobile use in that area. That’s a fun card to pull on the Sierra clubbers.

One thing that is for sure, even if killington has a larger footprint than a combined Stowe and Smuggs is that a new beast of the east will be claiming that title.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,545
Points
113
Location
NJ
One could argue that it’s the last independent ski “resort” and the others are more appropriately categorized as ski areas but whatever, the media gets things wrong or slightly off in just about every article out there.

The enviro nuts are going to resist for sure but in reality it would likely have beneficial impacts on automobile use in that area. That’s a fun card to pull on the Sierra clubbers.

One thing that is for sure, even if killington has a larger footprint than a combined Stowe and Smuggs is that a new beast of the east will be claiming that title.

I thought about the "resort" vs "area" distinction, but if you watch the video, they actually say "last independently owned ski area" instead of resort. So the text in the article doesn't even match exactly what was said on air in the video.

I also think the distinction between "resort" and "area" is a bit blurry anyway. What makes an "area" a "resort"? I'd say one criteria is lodging, but several of the other independents that were mentioned do have that. Activities other than skiing? Again, others have that. So who knows what they were really going for. The criteria would have to be extremely narrow and specific for Smuggs to be the "last" of it.
 

ThatGuy

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
1,611
Points
113
Location
America
I also think the distinction between "resort" and "area" is a bit blurry anyway. What makes an "area" a "resort"? I'd say one criteria is lodging, but several of the other independents that were mentioned do have that. Activities other than skiing? Again, others have that. So who knows what they were really going for. The criteria would have to be extremely narrow and specific for Smuggs to be the "last" of it.
I feel like one distinction could be whether there is adequate amenities/entertainment for non-skiers/boarders in the close vicinity.
So somewhere like a Jiminy Peak can be considered a resort while Catamount isn’t.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,545
Points
113
Location
NJ
There is Zero chance this gets approved...

They wouldn't let Vale build a parking lot for Christ sake...
I agree this isn't likely to be approved too easily...but the challenges getting the parking lot approved are completely irrelevant and different. Wasn't that the town that rejected that plan? And I tend to think the concerns with that weak attempt at a parking solution were valid. But they have nothing to do with the interconnect's chances. With the interconnect, it is more ACT 250 and the fact that you want to use state forest land for the project where the challenges will be...

So "they" is two different entities in this case...
 

jimmywilson69

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
3,236
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg, PA
I agree this isn't likely to be approved too easily...but the challenges getting the parking lot approved are completely irrelevant and different. Wasn't that the town that rejected that plan? And I tend to think the concerns with that weak attempt at a parking solution were valid. But they have nothing to do with the interconnect's chances. With the interconnect, it is more ACT 250 and the fact that you want to use state forest land for the project where the challenges will be...

So "they" is two different entities in this case...
Yes but if the Town wanted this to help with traffic an what not, can't they have an influence on Act 250 or is it completely separate?

While a weak attempt at the parking fiasco, it was at least something and it was silly to not approve it because the one thing they need is more parking. So instead the skiing community gets paid parking. Which I get was likely coming anyways...

I think it'd be pretty obvious if this gets approved that there would be a payoff...
 

Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
2,479
Points
113
Location
Mad River Valley / MA
I mostly agree, with the strong caveat that Vermont is extremely corrupt politically.
I have owned in VT for 15 years and pay pretty good attention to the politics up here. What makes you say the poitics are corrupt? I mean compaired to the other states that surround VT I get the impression that VT is the least corrupt.
 

urungus

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
1,865
Points
113
Location
Western Mass
I have owned in VT for 15 years and pay pretty good attention to the politics up here. What makes you say the poitics are corrupt? I mean compaired to the other states that surround VT I get the impression that VT is the least corrupt.
To start there’s the whole Jay Peak / Burke EB5 fiasco. But I’m of the opinion that politics are corrupt everywhere, VT state politics can’t be more corrupt than NY or NJ ?
 
Top