gmcunni
Active member
Sugarbush Resort transported to Northern CT
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Lot's of wasted space in the new lodge they built & it didn't solve the problem of overcrowding. They could have easily added another level for additional seating instead of having 100ft. ceilings.Build a new lodge at top of Gatehouse lift @ Sugarbush to alleviate the weekend crowds at the way too small Gatehouse lodge at the base.
I'm not a massive fan of Sugarloaf, besides the AZ summit but a tram to summit would be pretty cool. They put lifts in all kinds of windy crazy places in Europe why not Maine?
I'm not a massive fan of Sugarloaf, besides the AZ summit but a tram to summit would be pretty cool. They put lifts in all kinds of windy crazy places in Europe why not Maine?
Sugarbush Resort transported to Northern CT
Then there would be no snow on it.
I understand that the original design of the Gatehouse Lodge was modified at the last minute to reduce its size and to give us the miserably designed Castlerock Pub. A mid mountain lodge would alleviate the crowds at base both in the lodge and at Sugar Bravo. I always to do my best to try to avoid coming back to the base, which is some of the beauty of the Sugarbush lift/trail layout.Lot's of wasted space in the new lodge they built & it didn't solve the problem of overcrowding. They could have easily added another level for additional seating instead of having 100ft. ceilings.
P I understand that the original design of the Gatehouse Lodge was modified at the last minute to reduce its size and to give us the miserably designed Castlerock Pub. A mid mountain lodge would alleviate the crowds at base both in the lodge and at Sugar Bravo. I always to do my best to try to avoid coming back to the base, which is some of the beauty of the Sugarbush lift/trail layout.
Yes, but it is now really a bar for the 4 Twenties crowd. they have no issues walking up the hill. down thee hill is another story after a few Heady Toppers.Used to drink at the upstairs bar at the Valley house. Do they even have that anymore?
Yes, but it is now really a bar for the 4 Twenties crowd. they have no issues walking up the hill. down thee hill is another story after a few Heady Toppers.
I don't care what kind of lift they could put in to the summit of Sugarloaf. When temperatures are low & the wind is howling it's not fit for man or beast to be up there. There's a reason there are no trees on the summit & it's not because of altitude, it's no higher than Killington Peak.
You think Jay Peak and Burke would be thriving mountains for the public in 10 years with no EB-5 funding?
Castlerock pub was enlarged from it's original size. This was done a year or two after the new lodge opened. Has nothing to do with the wasted space upstairs.P I understand that the original design of the Gatehouse Lodge was modified at the last minute to reduce its size and to give us the miserably designed Castlerock Pub. A mid mountain lodge would alleviate the crowds at base both in the lodge and at Sugar Bravo. I always to do my best to try to avoid coming back to the base, which is some of the beauty of the Sugarbush lift/trail layout.
Jay Peak has a LOT of beds and questionable summer viability. Burke has an advantage in that there will be fewer beds and mountain biking brings a lot of people in. The real question is whether or not they can get mountain bikers to want to spend their money at Burke and not just Kingdom trails. That will take better management than we have seen recently. On the other hand, their recent enduro race drew 200 bikers, so it looks like bikers may have a short memory.Do you have a crystal ball?
The hotel is not open yet. Burke is not thriving. I'd attribute that to management more than anything.
Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone