billski
Active member
How do you rank a lodge in terms of aesthetics as well as operational efficiency?
I was reading the Crotched Mountain updates last night and they described all their improvements to the Lodge this year. I have to give you this: CM has one of the best operational lodges I've ever seen. From space to traffic flow, to capacity, it all works very well. All the improvements this year revolve again around operational efficiencies, safety and convenience. My kudos for that. Where it really fails is aesthetics. The steel framed building is simply fugly, inside and out. Drive by and you'd think it was a factory. Inside, it feels like a warehouse. Well, the new fireplace and the flags help to soften it a bit inside, but that's about it.
Bottom line is, I'm there to ski, so I'm all with them on their priorities outside, but I am always struck by how brutally utilitarian the lodge is.
Other lodges that are memorable in a sentence:
Stowe/Spruce Peak Base - gorgeous, great rental layout, reminds me of western resorts (i.e., Vail mid-mountain). Mt. Mansfield base - 1940s retro, can't help but trip over the UVM racers, don't change it.
Wachusett - Attractive and functional, everything on one level
Sugarbush - attractive, functional
Suicide 6 - Livin' in the 70's
Dartmouth Skiway - Pretty attractive building inside and out, for a college operation!
MRG Basebox - uber-retro, narrow stair and doorways, not much room -. It's actually inexpensively attractive: you go there for the experience. Birdcage- A big warm room, with a killer staircase to the bathroom!
Bolton - it works, it's tight on a weekend, food service needs a tad more room.
Waterville - it's not the lodge, it's the downslope parking that's a problem!
I was reading the Crotched Mountain updates last night and they described all their improvements to the Lodge this year. I have to give you this: CM has one of the best operational lodges I've ever seen. From space to traffic flow, to capacity, it all works very well. All the improvements this year revolve again around operational efficiencies, safety and convenience. My kudos for that. Where it really fails is aesthetics. The steel framed building is simply fugly, inside and out. Drive by and you'd think it was a factory. Inside, it feels like a warehouse. Well, the new fireplace and the flags help to soften it a bit inside, but that's about it.
Bottom line is, I'm there to ski, so I'm all with them on their priorities outside, but I am always struck by how brutally utilitarian the lodge is.
Other lodges that are memorable in a sentence:
Stowe/Spruce Peak Base - gorgeous, great rental layout, reminds me of western resorts (i.e., Vail mid-mountain). Mt. Mansfield base - 1940s retro, can't help but trip over the UVM racers, don't change it.
Wachusett - Attractive and functional, everything on one level
Sugarbush - attractive, functional
Suicide 6 - Livin' in the 70's
Dartmouth Skiway - Pretty attractive building inside and out, for a college operation!
MRG Basebox - uber-retro, narrow stair and doorways, not much room -. It's actually inexpensively attractive: you go there for the experience. Birdcage- A big warm room, with a killer staircase to the bathroom!
Bolton - it works, it's tight on a weekend, food service needs a tad more room.
Waterville - it's not the lodge, it's the downslope parking that's a problem!