• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Sugarbush

Geoff

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 30, 2004
Messages
5,100
Points
48
Location
South Dartmouth, Ma
Nuthin' worse than a thread that degrades into rants about spelling.

And besides... I'll bet silk panties 'r mighty comfy.
 

Lostone

New member
Joined
Jul 12, 2004
Messages
588
Points
0
Location
Sugarbush, Vermont
Our lo of the day probably comes from Middle English lo, a shortened form of loke, in turn from Old English loca, imperative of locian 'to look'.
The phrase has been used in serious literature since at least the 1800s. To cite just one example, "Lo and behold, there was something the matter with the great clock; and a workman on a pair of steps had taken its face off, and was poking instruments into the works...." (Charles Dickens, Dombey and Son).
Lo alone is attested from around 1000. Perhaps its most well-known use, without "behold," is from Alexander Pope's Essay on Criticism (1711), which begins with the familiar "Hope springs eternal in the human breast." The crucial lines are,
"The soul, uneasy, and confined from home
Rests and expatiates in a life to come.
Lo, the poor Indian! whose untutored mind
Sees God in clouds, or hears him in the wind..."
.
 

JD

New member
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
2,461
Points
0
Location
Northfield
Website
hotmail.com
Corrected! But since the club just won't let this thing go away, I may as well stir the pot again. So, Sugarbush won't let people hike for turns because of liability issues, but they are OK with people skiing woods at their own risk with 10 inches of base as long as the enter and exit the woods off of open trails.....


Honestly, which is more dangerous, letting people ski woods that is "open" by their trail policy with no where near enough base by any reasonable standards, or letting people ski open grassy fields with the same amount of cover.
Can't wait to hear the justification for this one..
PS
organized religion is for weak minded sheep.
PSS
Lo..I just looked at your avatar on the MRV board. Wow, you're pretty old to be skiing aren't you?
 
Last edited:

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,403
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
I have no idea, but if the Mountain Ops people at Sugarbush can't answer your question, maybe the good folks over at Wildcat can.....:lol:
 
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
17,569
Points
0
Corrected! But since the club just won't let this thing go away, I may as well stir the pot again. So, Sugarbush won't let people hike for turns because of liability issues, but they are OK with people skiing woods at their own risk with 10 inches of base as long as the enter and exit the woods off of open trails.....


Honestly, which is more dangerous, letting people ski woods that is "open" by their trail policy with no where near enough base by any reasonable standards, or letting people ski open grassy fields with the same amount of cover.
Can't wait to hear the justification for this one..
PS
organized religion is for weak minded sheep.
PSS
Lo..I just looked at your avatar on the MRV board. Wow, you're pretty old to be skiing aren't you?

Are you the guy with the granola stuck in your beard..:p
 

JD

New member
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
2,461
Points
0
Location
Northfield
Website
hotmail.com
Last edited:

billski

Active member
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
16,207
Points
38
Location
North Reading, Mass.
Website
ski.iabsi.com
boy, I'm glad I missed this thread today. Guess the nurse forgot to hand out the meds today.

A bit more snow might help the situation; all will be well again. It sure gets grumpy in here when the snow is sub-optimal ;) I seem to remember December 17th last year skiing in 12" of fresh pow. I'm figuring out my too-sick-to-work excuse now. Those are the important matters you should be focusing on....
 
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
17,569
Points
0
Ah...more uncoolness. 146 days huh....all at sugarbush? God, that's sounds so boring I almost just fell asleep thinking about it. Single huh? Not suprised. BTW, I am impressed with the Sugarbush loyalty, I haven't seen such blind adoration since the Republican National convention.

Wow..seriously..I put Sugarbush 2nd to Stowe north of Massachusettes..and Killington is the best skiing in Massachusettes..yes I consider everything south of Sugarbush to be Massachusettes. I'm a northern Vermont ski snob living in PA..lol..Holla
 

atkinson

New member
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
190
Points
0
Website
www.sugarbush.com
Read www.treeskier.com. Jay is the man.

For all the challenges, Sugarbush is an amazing place. I love all of northern Vermont too and try to venture as much as possible, although I tend to play where I work. 95% of my skiing or riding is right here in the Mad River Valley and I never get bored. How could you?

02102008-SlideBrookBlazer1.jpg

Blazers rock!

IMG_3144.JPG

The most important turn of the day.

012008-Willa1.jpg

Go go God-Willa! She can shoot fire from her eyes.

122007-SBrookDiggity1.jpg

Coach Diggity!

122007-Pow4.jpg

Hannah, you're the best. But you keep taking my powder ...

DigSB5-0307sm.jpg

Diggity again.

WaiteySB8-0307.jpg

Coach Waitey.

RH-SB-0407.jpg

Coach Rick.

eganSB10207.jpg

Egan brutha!

powglade1.jpg

Photo by Sandy Macys.

Just a little taste from the vault.

John
 
Top