But this has nothing to do with whether people care if others call out Sugarbush. The skiable acreage number is clearly stated. I would feel the same for any area. If only the 4,000-acre number was given, I would think Andy would have a fair point and Win/whomever should be asked about it. But given that they have both numbers, what is the issue? I would be interested to know whether the 500ish number includes marked glades, and that would be a fair question for any ski area that doesn't clearly specify. But there is no "tough[]" question here at all.
x2.