Marc
New member
I maintain my first answer. No.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
I maintain my first answer. No.
2 hours up nosedive? Wow that is slow. Less then an hour to the gondi house.
2 things made skiiang available to the "masses"
the first was lifts.
the second was locked heel (alpine) bindings.
Once that happened, "everyone could ski".
Before that people had been skiing for around 5-8 thousand years.
It's not about the descent when you are out in the woods touring around. It's exploration. It's looking around at all the hills you've never stood on top of and deciding you want to know what's up there. And after each new trip you will feel a stronger connection to your surroundings.
There was a lemming thread earlier on this week, or last. The real answer to that original question is ANY trail off a lift is just a bunch of lemmings. Totally fabricated scenario. Even if you then "hike" for something, it's not really as pure an experience as looking up at the top of the Mtn. as you put your skins back on for another lap and knowing every inch of your trip was self powered.
PLUS: You will never appriciate a deep powder run as much as if you earned every inch of vert.
It's the journey, not the destination.
Thank goodness most of you just ride the lifts and ski "the riverbed".
Cheers.
*ll*
*ll*
*ll*
*ll*
*ll*
*ll*
*ll*
*ll*
*ll*
((*
*))
((*
*))
((*
*))
((*
*))
((*
*))
I ski for the thrill of it. I dont get any thrill out of walking up a hill.
I hike for the exercise. I get to the top of a peak and it does nothing for me.
I ski for the thrill of it. I dont get any thrill out of walking up a hill.
I hike for the exercise. I get to the top of a peak and it does nothing for me.