MadMadWorld
Active member
My point was you can't operate a ski area when you can only realistically get a handful of good days out of it a year. People want consistency more than they want anything else. MRG gets by because at this point its unique, and offers an experience you can't get elsewhere on the East Coast, but what happens when getting that experience becomes increasingly difficult? People will increasingly default to planning visits to other mountains until their position is untenable.
But I also said they would have to change, and they very well may continue to find means to keep the mountain open. Even if that means installing snowmaking or making other upgrades. It would be foolish to assume something will remain the same forever.
I think some people misconstrued that to mean they could continue to get by on charm, but honestly I don't think that is viable long-term. However, I don't think changing MRG means it has to sacrifice what makes it unique either. That's really its selling point, so a balance of will be found, and I'm confident it will be.
Plus, its on the National Register of Historic Places.
Have you skied their much? It's a lot more than charm that keeps it afloat. It has arguably the most challenging lift accessible sidecountry (definitely the hardest within the ski area boundary). Most years the snowfall is great and because of the contours it holds the snow really well. Not much has changed since they opened in the 40s and a down year isn't going to make much of a difference because people will always come back (I will). And this is why:
http://www.tetongravity.com/blogs/Up-And-Comers-Shred-Vermont39s-Mad-River-Glen-6561182.htm