ski_resort_observer
Active member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2004
- Messages
- 3,423
- Points
- 38
- Location
- Waitsfield,Vt
- Website
- www.firstlightphotographics.com
"conditions are not good"...............not!
First, if you read the most recent trip reports you will find that the skiing in Vermont is pretty good. Check the most recent Sugarbush report. "the conditions are not good" is not exactly accurate.
Secondly people from NYC are not NYCer's but are New Yorkers. :wink:
You can have great conditions up north but to really get alot of folks thinking about going to Vermont from Boston or NYC it helps greatly if they have snow in their backyard. Gets them thinking about skiing.
I really wish this storm covered the whole northeast but getting dumps in southern NE isn't bad either.
I do understand your point tho. There will be people who after digging out will assume everyone in NE got alot of new snow. I have talked to those people on the phone and they will get very upset and want to know how that could happen. "how could we get a foot in Boston and you have nothing new in Vermont?". This is the point in time where I think about the book I am writing "what I really want to say" but refrain. My tongue is very heavily scarred from that job. :lol:
Greg said:No offense trailboss, but there are ski areas south of the Mass/VT border... And this will help the industry overall with the major cities receiving a lot of snow. Vermont resorts, due to their location, will inherently usually survive a crappy weather pattern like we saw in January. Central/Southern NE and other Northeast ski areas aren't as fortunate and some were really suffering (Powder Ridge, for example). A storm like this is nothing but good for the Industry, regardless of whether your favorite ski area received a foot or not. Even if VT did get pounded, many city folks aren't going to skip work tomorrow to ski it. The folks we're talking about are weekend warriors and if the snow in the back yard gets them thinking about skiing again, it's good for everybody. We're barely a week beyond that crappy thaw so don't worry about it. You guys will get yours in time...thetrailboss said:LVNLARG said:thetrailboss said:Well, word to wise, snow in New York City does nothing to improve skiing :roll: We have half an inch here in the Upper Valley.
It sure does improve ski area revenues though :lol:
In the short run, yes. In the long run, no. Those NYCer's and others (no offense...folks in here know what happens in Snow Country) will be flying up here and then will :argue: because the conditions aren't good and then they will wonder why.
Now we need that snow to come up here so we can enjoy it.
First, if you read the most recent trip reports you will find that the skiing in Vermont is pretty good. Check the most recent Sugarbush report. "the conditions are not good" is not exactly accurate.
Secondly people from NYC are not NYCer's but are New Yorkers. :wink:
You can have great conditions up north but to really get alot of folks thinking about going to Vermont from Boston or NYC it helps greatly if they have snow in their backyard. Gets them thinking about skiing.
I really wish this storm covered the whole northeast but getting dumps in southern NE isn't bad either.
I do understand your point tho. There will be people who after digging out will assume everyone in NE got alot of new snow. I have talked to those people on the phone and they will get very upset and want to know how that could happen. "how could we get a foot in Boston and you have nothing new in Vermont?". This is the point in time where I think about the book I am writing "what I really want to say" but refrain. My tongue is very heavily scarred from that job. :lol: